Crescent View South Charter School in Fresno, CA
(KG-12 • Public • Regular School)
City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in California) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 15
- Address
- 4348 W. Shaw Ave.
Fresno, CA 93722
- Telephone
- (559) 389-7270
(make sure to verify first before calling)
- Website
- http://www.cvsouth.org
- City-data.com school rating
- 15
- Students
- 582
- Classroom Teachers (FTE)
- 26.5
- National School Lunch
Program (NSLP) Status - No
- Free lunch eligible students
- 437
- Reduced-price lunch
eligible students - 48
- School district
- Westside Elementary
- Charter school
- Yes
- Magnet School Indicator
- No
- Shared Time Indicator
- Missing
- Adult education offered
- No
No street view available for this location
Ratings
This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
Crescent View South Charter School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:California: | 46 |
Fresno County: | 36 |
Fresno: | 32 |
Crescent View South Charter: | 15 |
Students & Teachers
Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 582
Enrollment in 2015: 588
Enrollment in 2014: 567
Enrollment in 2013: 365
Enrollment in 2012: 385
Enrollment in 2011: 595
Enrollment in 2010: 490
Crescent View South Charter School - Historical enrollment
Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
Grade | G09 | G10 | G11 | G12 | UG | Total |
---|
All students | 22 | 77 | 170 | 308 | 5 | 582 |
Female students | 13 | 45 | 88 | 146 | 2 | 294 |
Male students | 9 | 32 | 82 | 162 | 3 | 288 |
American Indian/Alaska Native students | 1 | 2 | 5 | 4 | - | 12 |
Asian students | 2 | 3 | 2 | 12 | - | 19 |
Hispanic students | 13 | 51 | 103 | 186 | 1 | 354 |
Black students | 1 | 6 | 11 | 17 | 2 | 37 |
White students | 5 | 15 | 46 | 88 | 2 | 156 |
Two or More Races students | - | - | 3 | 1 | - | 4 |
Enrollment by grade:
9th grade enrollment: 22
10th grade enrollment: 77
11th grade enrollment: 170
12th grade enrollment: 308
Ungraded enrollment: 5
Crescent View South Charter School - Historical enrollment by grade
Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 12,430 schools)
Female enrollment: 294 (50.5%)Here: | 50.5% |
California: | 49.4% |
Male enrollment: 288 (49.5%)Crescent View South Charter School: | 49.5% |
State: | 49.6% |
Crescent View South Charter School - Historical enrollment by gender
Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 12,430 schools)
American Indian/Alaska Native enrollment: 12 (2.1%)
Asian enrollment: 19 (3.3%)
Hispanic enrollment: 354 (60.8%)
Black enrollment: 37 (6.4%)Crescent View South Charter School: | 6.4% |
State: | 6.1% |
White enrollment: 156 (26.8%)Crescent View South Charter School: | 26.8% |
State: | 28.3% |
Two or More Races enrollment: 4 (0.7%)
Crescent View South Charter School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity
Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 10,111 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 485 (83.3%)Crescent View South Charter School: | 83.3% |
State: | 61.2% |
Free lunch eligible students: 437 (75.1%)
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 48 (8.2%)Crescent View South Charter School: | 8.2% |
California: | 8.6% |
Crescent View South Charter School - Lunch Program Eligibility
Teachers and support:
(State average from 12,394 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE): 26.5
Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 1.5
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 1
Student/Teacher RatioCrescent View South Charter School: | 21.9 |
California: | 22.8 |
Crescent View South Charter School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio
School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds:
$3,024,170- Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 33 (Salary Expenditures: $2,007,338)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $69,296)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 12.5 (Salary Expenditures: $538,485)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 4 (Salary Expenditures: $409,050)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds:
$2,310,794Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,:
$3,245,947- Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $2,079,589
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 2.5 (Salary Expenditures: $94,533)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 15 (Salary Expenditures: $662,774)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 4 (Salary Expenditures: $409,051)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds:
$2,396,902 Limited English Proficiency:
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 28 (male: 11, female: 17)
- Hispanic: 28 (male: 11, female: 17)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs
- Hispanic235
- American Indian7
- Asian19
- White25
- Multirace2
- IDEA10
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 288 (male: 130, female: 158)
- Hispanic: 235 (male: 104, female: 131)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 7 (male: 2, female: 5)
- Asian: 19 (male: 5, female: 14)
- White: 25 (male: 17, female: 8)
- Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 10 (male: 8, female: 2)
Students with disabilities:
Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.
Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 38 (male: 26, female: 12)
- Hispanic: 20 (male: 16, female: 4)
- Black: 4 (all female)
- White: 14 (male: 10, female: 4)
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 13 (male: 9, female: 4)
- Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- White: 5 (all male)
Students with disabilities served under IDEA
- Hispanic23
- American Indian4
- Black8
- White29
- LEP7
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 64 (male: 43, female: 21)
- Hispanic: 23 (male: 16, female: 7)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 4 (all male)
- Black: 8 (male: 4, female: 4)
- White: 29 (male: 19, female: 10)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 7 (all male)
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 17 (male: 12, female: 5)
- Hispanic: 2 (all male)
- White: 13 (male: 8, female: 5)
- Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
Statewide Student Assessments
Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments:
(State average from 10,463 schools)
Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments (SB) is one of the online summative assessments - part of California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) System.
The summative assessments are comprehensive, end-of-year assessments of grade-level learning that measure progress toward college and career readiness. Each test in English language arts/literacy (ELA) and mathematics is comprised of two parts: (1) a computer-adaptive test and (2) a performance task, administered within a selected testing window available at 66 percent of the instructional year for grades three through eight, and grade eleven.
The summative assessments are aligned with the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) for ELA and mathematics. The tests capitalize on the strengths of computer adaptive testing efficient and precise measurement across the full range of achievement and timely turnaround of results.
ELA Standard Met and Above
- All19%
- Males15%
- Females21%
- Hispanic24%
- White8%
ELA students tested: 159
ELA students with scores: 159
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 19% |
State: | 49% |
Standard Not Met:
57.9%Standard Nearly Met:
23.3%Standard Met:
18.2%Standard Exceeded:
0.6%11th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2482.7, Students tested: 159, Standard Not Met: 57.9%, Nearly Met: 23.3%, Met: 18.2%, Exceeded: 0.6%)Crescent View South Charter School - ELA Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Math Standard Met and Above
- All3%
- Males2%
- Females3%
- Hispanic3%
Math students tested: 158
Math students with scores: 158
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 3% |
California: | 38% |
Standard Not Met:
88.6%Standard Nearly Met:
8.9%Standard Met:
2.5%Standard Exceeded:
0.0%11th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2446.4, Students tested: 158, Standard Not Met: 88.6%, Nearly Met: 8.9%, Met: 2.5%, Exceeded: 0.0%)Crescent View South Charter School - Math Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
ELA Standard Met and Above
- All15%
- Males11%
- Females19%
- Hispanic11%
- White15%
ELA students tested: 214
ELA students with scores: 213
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 15% |
California: | 48% |
Standard Not Met:
53.0%Standard Nearly Met:
32.0%Standard Met:
14.0%Standard Exceeded:
1.0%11th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2493.9, Students tested: 214, Standard Not Met: 53.0%, Nearly Met: 32.0%, Met: 14.0%, Exceeded: 1.0%)Crescent View South Charter School - ELA Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Math Standard Met and Above
- All1%
- Males2%
- Hispanic1%
Math students tested: 213
Math students with scores: 211
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 1% |
California: | 37% |
Standard Not Met:
90.0%Standard Nearly Met:
9.0%Standard Met:
1.0%Standard Exceeded:
0.0%11th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2446.0, Students tested: 213, Standard Not Met: 90.0%, Nearly Met: 9.0%, Met: 1.0%, Exceeded: 0.0%)Crescent View South Charter School - Math Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
ELA Standard Met and Above
- All11%
- Males8%
- Females14%
- Hispanic6%
- White19%
ELA students tested: 180
ELA students with scores: 150
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 11% |
California: | 44% |
Standard Not Met:
58.0%Standard Nearly Met:
31.0%Standard Met:
11.0%Standard Exceeded:
0.0%All Grades:
7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2461.7, Students tested: 11, Standard Not Met: 64.0%, Nearly Met: 27.0%, Met: 9.0%, Exceeded: 0.0%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2461.0, Students tested: 19, Standard Not Met: 72.0%, Nearly Met: 28.0%, Met: 0.0%, Exceeded: 0.0%)11th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2489.2, Students tested: 150, Standard Not Met: 55.0%, Nearly Met: 32.0%, Met: 12.0%, Exceeded: 0.0%)Crescent View South Charter School - ELA Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Math students tested: 189
Math students with scores: 146
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 1% |
State: | 34% |
Standard Not Met:
95.0%Standard Nearly Met:
5.0%Standard Met:
1.0%Standard Exceeded:
0.0%All Grades:
7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2426.5, Students tested: 12, Standard Not Met: 91.0%, Nearly Met: 9.0%, Met: 0.0%, Exceeded: 0.0%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2414.5, Students tested: 20, Standard Not Met: 100.0%, Nearly Met: 0.0%, Met: 0.0%, Exceeded: 0.0%)11th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2444.1, Students tested: 157, Standard Not Met: 94.0%, Nearly Met: 5.0%, Met: 1.0%, Exceeded: 0.0%)Crescent View South Charter School - Math Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Paper-based CAASPP:
(State average from 9,784 schools)
California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) System includes paper-based tests:
California Standards Tests (CSTs) - The CSTs for science in grades five, eight, and ten are administered only to students in California public schools. All questions are multiple-choice. These tests were developed specifically to assess students' knowledge of the California content standards in science.
CST Science students tested: 155
CST Science students with scores: 89
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 11% |
State: | 54% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
18.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
28.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
43.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
11.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
0.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.10th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 303.3, Students tested: 155, Far Below Basic: 18.0%, Below Basic: 28.0%, Basic: 43.0%, Proficient: 11.0%, Advanced: 0.0%) CST Science students tested: 19
CST Science students with scores: 19
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 0% |
California: | 56% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
52.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
16.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
32.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
0.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
0.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 256.1, Students tested: 19, Far Below Basic: 52.0%, Below Basic: 16.0%, Basic: 32.0%, Proficient: 0.0%, Advanced: 0.0%)
CST Science students tested: 92
CST Science students with scores: 91
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 15% |
California: | 56% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
23.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
18.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
44.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
13.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
2.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.10th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 303.8, Students tested: 92, Far Below Basic: 23.0%, Below Basic: 18.0%, Basic: 44.0%, Proficient: 13.0%, Advanced: 2.0%) CST Science students tested: 147
CST Science students with scores: 147
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 15% |
California: | 60% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
24.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
30.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
31.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
14.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
1.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.10th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 301.1, Students tested: 147, Far Below Basic: 24.0%, Below Basic: 30.0%, Basic: 31.0%, Proficient: 14.0%, Advanced: 1.0%) California High School Exit Exam:
(State average from 2,357 schools)
Beginning with the Class of 2006, students in California public schools were required to pass the California High School Exit Examination (CAHSEE) to demonstrate competency in grade-level skills in reading, writing, and mathematics to earn a high school diploma. The content of the CAHSEE was based on content standards in English-language arts and mathematics that were adopted by the State Board of Education (SBE) in 2003. In 2010, the SBE adopted the Common Core State Standards in English language arts and mathematics. The CAHSEE has been repealed. Assembly Bill 830 was chaptered into law by Governor Brown on October 10, 2017. This law eliminates the CAHSEE and removes it as a condition of receiving a diploma of graduation or a condition of graduation from high school.
Crescent View South Charter School - California High School Exit Exam results
2014-15 results for this school are based on 6 separate tests and combined using weighted average.Math Mean Scale Score
- All348
- Hispanic345
- Black355
- White357
Math Mean Scale Score: | 348 |
California: | 374 |
Math Percentage Passed: | 41% |
California: | 68% |
Math Number Tested: 335
Math Number Passed: 137
Math Percent Correct compared to California average:Probability & Statistics: | 59% |
State: | 69% |
Number Sense: | 52% |
State: | 65% |
Algebra & Functions: | 55% |
State: | 68% |
Measurement & Geometry: | 48% |
California: | 64% |
Algebra 1: | 39% |
California: | 58% |
ELA Mean Scale Score
- All342
- Hispanic316
- Black351
- White306
ELA Mean Scale Score: | 342 |
State: | 370 |
ELA Percentage Passed: | 55% |
California: | 68% |
ELA Number Tested: 280
ELA Number Passed: 154
ELA Percent Correct compared to California average:Reading - Word Analysis: | 71% |
State: | 76% |
Reading - Reading Comprehension: | 62% |
State: | 71% |
Reading - Literary Responses and Analysis: | 68% |
California: | 75% |
Writing - Writing Strategies: | 56% |
California: | 64% |
Writing - Writing Conventions: | 61% |
California: | 69% |
2013-14 results for this school are based on 6 separate tests and combined using weighted average.Math Mean Scale Score
- All343
- Hispanic340
- Black334
- White358
Math Mean Scale Score: | 343 |
California: | 375 |
Math Percentage Passed: | 35% |
California: | 68% |
Math Number Tested: 392
Math Number Passed: 136
Math Percent Correct compared to California average:Probability & Statistics: | 54% |
California: | 70% |
Number Sense: | 51% |
California: | 68% |
Algebra & Functions: | 48% |
California: | 67% |
Measurement & Geometry: | 44% |
California: | 63% |
-
ELA Mean Scale Score
- All344
- Hispanic342
- White356
ELA Mean Scale Score: | 344 |
State: | 368 |
ELA Percentage Passed: | 42% |
California: | 66% |
ELA Number Tested: 345
ELA Number Passed: 145
ELA Percent Correct compared to California average:Reading - Word Analysis: | 63% |
California: | 72% |
Reading - Reading Comprehension: | 59% |
California: | 71% |
Reading - Literary Responses and Analysis: | 61% |
State: | 73% |
Writing - Writing Strategies: | 51% |
California: | 64% |
Writing - Writing Conventions: | 60% |
California: | 70% |
2012-13 results for this school are based on 5 separate tests and combined using weighted average.Math Mean Scale Score
- All347
- Hispanic348
- Black349
- White348
Math Mean Scale Score: | 347 |
California: | 374 |
Math Percentage Passed: | 38% |
State: | 67% |
Math Number Tested: 244
Math Number Passed: 93
Math Percent Correct compared to California average:Probability & Statistics: | 57% |
State: | 69% |
Number Sense: | 53% |
State: | 66% |
Algebra & Functions: | 52% |
State: | 68% |
Measurement & Geometry: | 47% |
State: | 62% |
Algebra 1: | 38% |
California: | 57% |
ELA Mean Scale Score
- All340
- Hispanic329
- White228
ELA Mean Scale Score: | 340 |
State: | 369 |
ELA Percentage Passed: | 48% |
California: | 65% |
ELA Number Tested: 217
ELA Number Passed: 104
ELA Percent Correct compared to California average:Reading - Word Analysis: | 66% |
State: | 74% |
Reading - Reading Comprehension: | 60% |
State: | 71% |
Reading - Literary Responses and Analysis: | 64% |
California: | 72% |
Writing - Writing Strategies: | 53% |
California: | 64% |
Writing - Writing Conventions: | 60% |
California: | 68% |
2011-12 results for this school are based on 3 separate tests and combined using weighted average.Math Mean Scale Score
- All351
- Hispanic349
- White368
Math Mean Scale Score: | 351 |
State: | 373 |
Math Percentage Passed: | 47% |
State: | 67% |
Math Number Tested: 200
Math Number Passed: 94
Math Percent Correct compared to California average:Probability & Statistics: | 63% |
California: | 69% |
Number Sense: | 54% |
California: | 65% |
Algebra & Functions: | 56% |
State: | 67% |
Measurement & Geometry: | 50% |
California: | 63% |
Algebra 1: | 42% |
California: | 57% |
ELA Mean Scale Score
- All357
- Hispanic356
- White376
ELA Mean Scale Score: | 357 |
California: | 368 |
ELA Percentage Passed: | 60% |
State: | 65% |
ELA Number Tested: 169
ELA Number Passed: 102
ELA Percent Correct compared to California average:Reading - Word Analysis: | 73% |
California: | 74% |
Reading - Reading Comprehension: | 64% |
California: | 70% |
Reading - Literary Responses and Analysis: | 70% |
State: | 74% |
Writing - Writing Strategies: | 56% |
California: | 63% |
Writing - Writing Conventions: | 62% |
California: | 68% |
2010-11 results for this school are based on 2 separate tests and combined using weighted average.Math Mean Scale Score
- All353
- Hispanic353
- White357
Math Mean Scale Score: | 353 |
California: | 370 |
Math Percentage Passed: | 53% |
State: | 64% |
Math Number Tested: 121
Math Number Passed: 64
Math Percent Correct compared to California average:Probability & Statistics: | 64% |
California: | 68% |
Number Sense: | 54% |
California: | 66% |
Algebra & Functions: | 58% |
State: | 66% |
Measurement & Geometry: | 52% |
California: | 59% |
Algebra 1: | 42% |
California: | 54% |
ELA Mean Scale Score
- All357
- Hispanic355
- White368
ELA Mean Scale Score: | 357 |
State: | 369 |
ELA Percentage Passed: | 58% |
State: | 65% |
ELA Number Tested: 105
ELA Number Passed: 61
ELA Percent Correct compared to California average:Reading - Word Analysis: | 64% |
State: | 72% |
Reading - Reading Comprehension: | 68% |
State: | 70% |
Reading - Literary Responses and Analysis: | 68% |
State: | 72% |
Writing - Writing Strategies: | 61% |
California: | 66% |
Writing - Writing Conventions: | 61% |
California: | 67% |
2009-10 results for this school are based on 3 separate tests and combined using weighted average.Math Mean Scale Score: | 354 |
State: | 370 |
Math Percentage Passed: | 52% |
State: | 63% |
Math Number Tested: 136
Math Number Passed: 71
Math Percent Correct compared to California average:Probability & Statistics: | 63% |
State: | 68% |
Number Sense: | 59% |
State: | 65% |
Algebra & Functions: | 61% |
California: | 66% |
Measurement & Geometry: | 51% |
State: | 59% |
-
ELA Mean Scale Score: | 362 |
State: | 366 |
ELA Percentage Passed: | 69% |
State: | 63% |
ELA Number Tested: 134
ELA Number Passed: 92
ELA Percent Correct compared to California average:Reading - Word Analysis: | 72% |
California: | 70% |
Reading - Reading Comprehension: | 68% |
California: | 70% |
Reading - Literary Responses and Analysis: | 72% |
State: | 71% |
Writing - Writing Strategies: | 59% |
California: | 60% |
Writing - Writing Conventions: | 66% |
State: | 68% |
The Physical Fitness Test:
The Physical Fitness Test (PFT) for students in California schools is the FITNESSGRAM. The main goal of the test is to help students in starting life-long habits of regular physical activity.
Aerobic Capacity:9th grade:
(Students tested: 172, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 2.3%, Needs Improvement: 83.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 14.6%)
Body Composition:9th grade:
(Students tested: 172, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 56.4%, Needs Improvement: 15.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 28.5%)
Abdominal Strength:9th grade:
(Students tested: 172, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 20.3%, Needs Improvement: 79.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:9th grade:
(Students tested: 172, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 76.7%, Needs Improvement: 23.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:9th grade:
(Students tested: 172, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 27.9%, Needs Improvement: 72.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:9th grade:
(Students tested: 172, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 58.7%, Needs Improvement: 41.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:9th grade:
(Students tested: 38, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 68.4%, Needs Improvement: 13.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 18.4%)
Body Composition:9th grade:
(Students tested: 38, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 55.3%, Needs Improvement: 18.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 26.3%)
Abdominal Strength:9th grade:
(Students tested: 38, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 44.7%, Needs Improvement: 55.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:9th grade:
(Students tested: 38, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 94.7%, Needs Improvement: 5.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:9th grade:
(Students tested: 38, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 63.2%, Needs Improvement: 36.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:9th grade:
(Students tested: 38, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 63.2%, Needs Improvement: 36.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:7th grade:
(Students tested: 12, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 41.7%, Needs Improvement: 50.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 8.3%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 16, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 93.8%, Needs Improvement: 6.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Body Composition:7th grade:
(Students tested: 12, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 33.3%, Needs Improvement: 8.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 58.4%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 16, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 37.5%, Needs Improvement: 43.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 18.7%)
Abdominal Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 12, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 25.0%, Needs Improvement: 75.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 16, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 50.0%, Needs Improvement: 50.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 12, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 100.0%, Needs Improvement: 0.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 16, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 87.5%, Needs Improvement: 12.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 12, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 66.7%, Needs Improvement: 33.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 16, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 62.5%, Needs Improvement: 37.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:7th grade:
(Students tested: 12, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 41.7%, Needs Improvement: 58.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)9th grade:
(Students tested: 16, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 68.8%, Needs Improvement: 31.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:9th grade:
(Students tested: 56, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 85.7%, Needs Improvement: 10.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 3.6%)
Body Composition:9th grade:
(Students tested: 56, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 58.9%, Needs Improvement: 21.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 19.7%)
Abdominal Strength:9th grade:
(Students tested: 56, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 60.7%, Needs Improvement: 39.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:9th grade:
(Students tested: 56, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 87.5%, Needs Improvement: 12.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:9th grade:
(Students tested: 56, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 67.9%, Needs Improvement: 32.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:9th grade:
(Students tested: 56, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 58.9%, Needs Improvement: 41.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:9th grade:
(Students tested: 30, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 90.0%, Needs Improvement: 6.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 3.3%)
Body Composition:9th grade:
(Students tested: 30, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 60.0%, Needs Improvement: 10.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 30.0%)
Abdominal Strength:9th grade:
(Students tested: 30, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 66.7%, Needs Improvement: 33.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:9th grade:
(Students tested: 30, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 96.7%, Needs Improvement: 3.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:9th grade:
(Students tested: 30, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 50.0%, Needs Improvement: 50.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:9th grade:
(Students tested: 30, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 56.7%, Needs Improvement: 43.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:9th grade:
(Students tested: 37, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 51.4%, Needs Improvement: 8.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 40.5%)
Body Composition:9th grade:
(Students tested: 37, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 59.5%, Needs Improvement: 2.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 37.8%)
Abdominal Strength:9th grade:
(Students tested: 37, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 67.6%, Needs Improvement: 32.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:9th grade:
(Students tested: 37, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 89.2%, Needs Improvement: 10.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:9th grade:
(Students tested: 37, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 45.9%, Needs Improvement: 54.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:9th grade:
(Students tested: 37, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 67.6%, Needs Improvement: 32.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
California English Language Development Test:
(State average from 9,932 schools)
Students in kindergarten through grade twelve whose home language is not English are required by law to take an English skills test. In California, the test is called the California English Language Development Test (CELDT).
Crescent View South Charter School - students who met CELDT criterion (all grades)
All Grades:Student Count: 47
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 26
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 55.0% |
State: | 34.0% |
Grade 9:Student Count: 8
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 5
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 63.0% |
California: | 33.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 589.6 |
California: | 533.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 600.3 |
California: | 534.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 587.9 |
State: | 515.1 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 573.9 |
State: | 513.2 |
Grade 10:Student Count: 11
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 8
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 73.0% |
California: | 36.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 611.5 |
California: | 556.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 589.7 |
State: | 555.2 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 623.5 |
State: | 533.6 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 588.5 |
State: | 530.8 |
Grade 11:Student Count: 11
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 8
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 73.0% |
California: | 45.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 644.6 |
State: | 575.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 644.3 |
California: | 573.9 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 583.0 |
California: | 550.8 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 590.7 |
California: | 544.5 |
Grade 12:Student Count: 17
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 5
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 29.0% |
California: | 44.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 555.6 |
State: | 564.9 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 579.4 |
California: | 567.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 602.7 |
State: | 544.2 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 575.2 |
State: | 532.5 |
All Grades:Student Count: 35
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 10
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 29.0% |
State: | 34.0% |
Grade 10:Student Count: 8
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 2
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 25.0% |
State: | 39.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 550.6 |
California: | 565.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 569.6 |
State: | 563.1 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 537.1 |
State: | 541.6 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 580.0 |
California: | 537.7 |
Grade 12:Student Count: 20
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 8
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 40.0% |
State: | 43.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 583.2 |
California: | 566.5 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 596.1 |
California: | 570.2 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 553.7 |
California: | 548.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 574.0 |
State: | 536.0 |
All Grades:Student Count: 29
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 5
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 17.0% |
State: | 34.0% |
Grade 11:Student Count: 7
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 3
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 43.0% |
California: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 581.6 |
California: | 585.5 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 588.1 |
State: | 581.9 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 553.6 |
State: | 559.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 576.1 |
California: | 558.0 |
Grade 12:Student Count: 15
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 2
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 13.0% |
California: | 49.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 547.7 |
California: | 584.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 585.7 |
California: | 579.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 543.6 |
State: | 559.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 550.4 |
State: | 552.4 |
All Grades:Student Count: 26
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 6
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 23.0% |
California: | 34.0% |
Grade 11:Student Count: 8
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 2
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 25.0% |
State: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 526.5 |
State: | 589.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 556.9 |
California: | 582.8 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 521.9 |
State: | 562.3 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 528.1 |
State: | 562.9 |
Grade 12:Student Count: 16
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 3
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 19.0% |
California: | 50.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 580.7 |
State: | 589.0 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 590.6 |
California: | 582.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 560.6 |
State: | 563.7 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 561.6 |
State: | 557.6 |
All Grades:Student Count: 14
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 5
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 36.0% |
State: | 34.0% |
Grade 11:Student Count: 6
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 2
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 33.0% |
California: | 50.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 594.2 |
California: | 592.9 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 594.7 |
State: | 582.8 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 527.2 |
State: | 568.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 565.2 |
State: | 569.2 |
Grade 12:Student Count: 6
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 2
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 33.0% |
California: | 50.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 554.2 |
State: | 590.0 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 609.8 |
California: | 581.1 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 527.7 |
State: | 565.5 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 589.5 |
State: | 562.3 |
All Grades:Student Count: 18
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 7
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 39.0% |
State: | 35.0% |
Grade 10:Student Count: 7
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 3
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 43.0% |
California: | 39.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 583.4 |
State: | 575.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 596.9 |
State: | 568.7 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 537.0 |
State: | 564.8 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 593.3 |
State: | 557.8 |
Grade 12:Student Count: 7
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 2
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 29.0% |
California: | 49.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 565.1 |
State: | 590.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 623.7 |
State: | 582.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 520.6 |
State: | 577.3 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 600.3 |
State: | 559.6 |
All Grades:Student Count: 29
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 4
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 14.0% |
State: | 31.0% |
Grade 9:Student Count: 11
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 1
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 9.0% |
California: | 33.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 528.5 |
California: | 546.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 540.8 |
California: | 551.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 489.2 |
State: | 550.7 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 551.3 |
California: | 544.5 |
Grade 10:Student Count: 8
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 2
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 25.0% |
State: | 32.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 572.5 |
State: | 560.5 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 600.3 |
State: | 565.1 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 517.8 |
California: | 559.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 577.6 |
California: | 550.5 |
Grade 11:Student Count: 7
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 1
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 14.0% |
State: | 40.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 560.0 |
California: | 575.1 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 610.4 |
State: | 579.2 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 536.9 |
California: | 570.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 555.4 |
California: | 557.7 |
Accountability
Adequate Yearly Progress:
(State average from 9,846 schools)
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) - Accountability system mandated by federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Statistics are based on test results of the Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program, the California High School Exit Examination (CAHSEE), and the California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA).
Comments
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: