Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Cisco J H School in Cisco, TX
(06-08 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 56
Address
 1200 PERSHING
Cisco, TX 76437
Telephone
(254) 442-3004
(make sure to verify first before calling)
City-data.com school rating
56
Students
182
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
20.0
Free lunch eligible students
91
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
10
School district
CISCO ISD
Charter school
No
Title I status
Title I schoolwide school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
CISCO H S (0.0 miles):

82
CISCO EL (0.8 miles):

69
Cisco J H School:

56
MORAN SCHOOL (15.6 miles):

54
EASTLAND H S (9.8 miles):

53
RISING STAR H S (18.9 miles):

53
SIEBERT EL (9.6 miles):

49
EASTLAND MIDDLE (9.8 miles):

44
RISING STAR EL (19.0 miles):

33
Cisco J H School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Eastland County:

50
Cisco:

69
Cisco J H School:

56

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 182
Enrollment in 2015: 178
Enrollment in 2014: 196
Enrollment in 2013: 195
Enrollment in 2012: 189
Enrollment in 2011: 189
Enrollment in 2010: 187
Enrollment in 2009: 179
Enrollment in 2008: 184
Enrollment in 2007: 172
Enrollment in 2006: 184
Enrollment in 2005: 183
Enrollment in 2004: 205
Enrollment in 2003: 194
Enrollment in 2002: 192
Enrollment in 2001: 187
Enrollment in 2000: 201
Enrollment in 1999: 227

Cisco J H School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
GradeG06G07G08Total
All students625862182
Female students35303095
Male students27283287
American Indian/Alaska Native students21 - 3
Asian students2 - - 2
Hispanic students1910938
White students384448130
Two or More Races students1359

Enrollment by grade:
6th grade enrollment: 62
7th grade enrollment: 58
8th grade enrollment: 62

Cisco J H School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Female enrollment: 95 (52.2%)
School:

52.2%
State:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 87 (47.8%)
Cisco J H School:

47.8%
Texas:

50.1%

Cisco J H School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
American Indian/Alaska Native enrollment: 3 (1.6%)
Cisco J H School:

1.6%
Texas:

0.4%
Asian enrollment: 2 (1.1%)
Here:

1.1%
Texas:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 38 (20.9%)
School:

20.9%
State:

46.9%
White enrollment: 130 (71.4%)
Here:

71.4%
Texas:

32.3%
Two or More Races enrollment: 9 (4.9%)
Here:

4.9%
State:

2.1%

Cisco J H School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 101 (55.5%)
Cisco J H School:

55.5%
State:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 91 (50.0%)
School:

50.0%
Texas:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 10 (5.5%)
Here:

5.5%
State:

6.2%

Cisco J H School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE): 20

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 3.1
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 1
Number of FTE school counselors: 1
Number of FTE nurses: 0.3

Student/Teacher Ratio
School:

9.1
Texas:

15.6

Cisco J H School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $781,659
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 17.3 (Salary Expenditures: $554,986)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 3 (Salary Expenditures: $18,601)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 2.8 (Salary Expenditures: $140,461)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 1 (Salary Expenditures: $67,611)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $70,113
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $958,221
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $714,062
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 4 (Salary Expenditures: $36,088)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 2.8 (Salary Expenditures: $140,461)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 1 (Salary Expenditures: $67,611)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $73,957

Students with disabilities:
Show data for
Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 20 (male: 10, female: 10)
  • White: 20 (male: 10, female: 10)
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 23 (male: 10, female: 13)
  • Hispanic: 5 (all female)
  • White: 16 (male: 8, female: 8)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 1,054 schools)
A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in 6th grade: 2 (all male)
  • Two or More Races: 2

Percent of 6th grade students retained
School:

3.2%
Texas:

4.1%
Total number of students retained in 8th grade: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2
  • Section 504: 2

Percent of 8th grade students retained
Cisco J H School:

3.2%
Texas:

7.2%

Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average from 7,254 schools)
This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 14 (male: 7, female: 7)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
School:

76.9
State:

79.4

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 2,606 schools)
The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
6th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,628
  • Males1,641
  • Females1,619
  • Hispanic1,601
  • White1,628
Math Average Scale Score:

1,628
State:

1,546
Math students tested: 76
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 76

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.9 (59%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.2 (54%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 3.3 (55%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.4 (48%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 44%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 33%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 9%

14%
44%
33%
9%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,641, Tested: 31, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 38%, Masters: 10%)
13%
39%
38%
10%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,619, Tested: 45, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 46%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 9%)
16%
46%
29%
9%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,601, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 69%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 0%)
6%
69%
25%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,628, Tested: 57, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 9%)
18%
38%
35%
9%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,607
  • Males1,600
  • Females1,613
  • Hispanic1,578
  • White1,611
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,607
State:

1,457
Reading students tested: 75
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 76

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.5 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.8 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.9 (66%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 22%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 39%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 16%

23%
22%
39%
16%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,600, Tested: 31, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%, Approaches: 19%, Meets: 42%, Masters: 13%)
26%
19%
42%
13%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,613, Tested: 44, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 18%)
20%
25%
37%
18%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,578, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 13%)
25%
25%
37%
13%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,611, Tested: 56, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 38%, Masters: 16%)
23%
23%
38%
16%
7th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All1,644
  • Males1,657
  • Females1,629
  • Hispanic1,628
  • White1,648
Math Average Scale Score:

1,644
Texas:

1,571
Math students tested: 61
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 61

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.9 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8 (53%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.9 (49%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.4 (48%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 28%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 38%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 29%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 5%

28%
38%
29%
5%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,657, Tested: 32, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 6%)
16%
43%
35%
6%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,629, Tested: 29, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 41%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 3%)
41%
31%
25%
3%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,628, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 0%)
33%
27%
40%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,648, Tested: 42, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 5%)
26%
43%
26%
5%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All1,680
  • Males1,675
  • Females1,686
  • Hispanic1,639
  • White1,698
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,680
Texas:

1,550
Reading students tested: 61
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 61

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6 (76%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.8 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 11.2 (70%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 33%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 14%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 38%

15%
33%
14%
38%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,675, Tested: 32, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 6%, Masters: 41%)
19%
34%
6%
41%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,686, Tested: 29, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 34%)
10%
31%
25%
34%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,639, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 13%)
20%
33%
34%
13%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,698, Tested: 42, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 9%, Masters: 48%)
14%
29%
9%
48%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All4,106
  • Males4,060
  • Females4,153
  • Hispanic3,872
  • White4,188
Writing Average Scale Score:

4,106
State:

3,515
Writing students tested: 61
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 61

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 9 (56%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.8 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 14 (83%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 25%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 51%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 16%

8%
25%
51%
16%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,060, Tested: 31, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 52%, Masters: 13%)
10%
25%
52%
13%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,153, Tested: 30, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 50%, Masters: 20%)
7%
23%
50%
20%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,872, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 7%)
20%
33%
40%
7%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,188, Tested: 42, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 53%, Masters: 21%)
5%
21%
53%
21%
8th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All1,688
  • Males1,667
  • Females1,707
  • Hispanic1,701
  • White1,682
Math Average Scale Score:

1,688
State:

1,539
Math students tested: 65
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 66

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 2.5 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.8 (61%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9 (60%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 4.2 (60%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 32%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 32%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 14%

22%
32%
32%
14%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,667, Tested: 30, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 13%)
33%
27%
27%
13%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,707, Tested: 35, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 14%)
11%
38%
37%
14%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,701, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 14%)
21%
36%
29%
14%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,682, Tested: 48, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 13%)
23%
29%
35%
13%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All1,687
  • Males1,648
  • Females1,720
  • Hispanic1,695
  • White1,684
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,687
Texas:

1,561
Reading students tested: 65
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 66

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.7 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 14.1 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 11.1 (65%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 33%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 22%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 23%

22%
33%
22%
23%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,648, Tested: 30, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 17%)
33%
37%
13%
17%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,720, Tested: 35, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 29%)
11%
32%
28%
29%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,695, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 21%)
14%
36%
29%
21%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,684, Tested: 48, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 25%)
25%
33%
17%
25%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All3,862
  • Males3,872
  • Females3,853
  • Hispanic3,775
  • White3,861
Science Average Scale Score:

3,862
State:

3,634
Science students tested: 64
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 65

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6 (54%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.1 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.8 (62%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 7.5 (68%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 39%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 25%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 19%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 17%

39%
25%
19%
17%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,872, Tested: 29, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 45%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 17%)
45%
17%
21%
17%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,853, Tested: 35, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 34%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 17%)
34%
32%
17%
17%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,775, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%, Approaches: 46%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 8%)
31%
46%
15%
8%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,861, Tested: 48, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 42%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 19%)
42%
20%
19%
19%

    Social Studies Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All3,740
  • Males3,725
  • Females3,752
  • Hispanic3,755
  • White3,723
Social Studies Average Scale Score:

3,740
State:

3,461
Social Studies students tested: 63
# Absent - Not Tested: 2
Social Studies # Answer Documents Submitted: 65

Social Studies Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 10.1 (59%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.1 (61%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.7 (57%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.9 (56%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 33%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 11%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 16%

40%
33%
11%
16%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,725, Tested: 28, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 43%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 14%)
43%
32%
11%
14%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,752, Tested: 35, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 37%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 17%)
37%
34%
12%
17%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,755, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%, Approaches: 54%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 15%)
31%
54%
15%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,723, Tested: 47, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 45%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 17%)
45%
25%
13%
17%

Health & Safety


Corporal Punishment:
Show data for
This school uses corporal punishment to discipline students
Corporal punishment refers to paddling, spanking, or other forms of physical punishment imposed on a child.
Instances of corporal punishment (Students without disabilities): 1
Students without disabilities who received corporal punishment: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2

Restraint and Seclusion:
Show data for

(State average from 2,148 schools)
Physical restraint refers to a personal restriction that immobilizes or reduces the ability of a student to move his or her torso, arms, legs, or head freely. The term physical restraint does not include a physical escort. Physical escort means a temporary touching or holding of the hand, wrist, arm, shoulder or back for the purpose of inducing a student who is acting out to walk to a safe location.
Total Number of students with disabilities (IDEA) subjected to physical restraint: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2

Students with disabilities (IDEA) subjected to physical restraint per 1,000 students
Cisco J H School:

11.0
State:

6.8

Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)
Out-of-school suspension
  • For students with disabilities served under IDEA : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his/her regular school for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes to another setting (e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include both removals in which no individualized family service plan(IFSP) or individualized education plan(IEP) services are provided because the removal is 10 days or less as well as removals in which the child continues to receive services according to his/her IFSP or IEP.
  • For students without disabilities and students with disabilities served solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his / her regular school for at least half a day(but less than the remainder of the school year) for disciplinary purposes to another setting(e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include removals in which no educational services are provided, and removals in which educational services are provided(e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring).
In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.

    School days missed due to out-of-school suspension

  • Hispanic1
  • American Indian1
  • White3
  • IDEA3
  • 5041
School days missed due to out-of-school suspension: 5 (male: 3, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 1 (all male)
  • American Indian / Alaska Native: 1 (all male)
  • White: 3 (male: 1, female: 2)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 3 (male: 2, female: 1)
  • Section 504: 1 (all male)
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students without disabilities): 2

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students without disabilities)
School:

11.0
State:

102.7
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 11 (male: 9, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all male)
  • White: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2 (all female)
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students with disabilities): 3

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students with disabilities)
Cisco J H School:

16.5
Texas:

27.5
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Section 504 only): 1

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Section 504 only)
School:

5.5
Texas:

12.0
Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 2 (all female)
  • White: 2
  • Section 504: 7
Students with disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 6 (male: 4, female: 2)
  • American Indian / Alaska Native: 2 (all male)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Section 504: 2 (all male)

Comments

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss Cisco, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.

  1. All Cities
  2. Texas
  3. Cisco main city page
  4. Schools in Texas
  5. Cisco J H School


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents