City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is
18.
Other nearby schools ratings:
Miami Springs Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida: | 45 |
Miami-Dade County: | 45 |
Miami Springs: | 45 |
Miami Springs Middle School: | 18 |
Discuss this school with others on our active
Florida forum
Phone: (305) 888-6457 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 13
School number: 6521
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: DADE
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (305) 887-5281
Magnet Program.
Principal: Maria C Mason
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status:
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 21
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 111
Senate District: 40
School Web Address: http://msms.dadeschools.net/
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 63% |
State average from 613 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 58% |
State average from 612 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 84% |
State average from 613 schools: | 88% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 38% |
State average from 612 schools: | 51% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 66% |
State average from 613 schools: | 64% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 67% |
State average from 612 schools: | 70% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 68% |
State average from 613 schools: | 62% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 73% |
State average from 613 schools: | 68% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 517 |
State average from 613 schools: | 545 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 613 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: B
Grade in 2009: B
Grade in 2008: C
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 119999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateMIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 83% |
State average from 614 schools: | 56% |
Minority RateHere: | 94% |
State average from 614 schools: | 49% |
Region: 5
Title I: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1652 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1652 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientMIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 94% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 581
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 57% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1542
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1511
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 54% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1542
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1510
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 92 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 92 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 37
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 92
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 85
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 92
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 85
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 228 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 228 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 93% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 76
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 46% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 214
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 211
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientMIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 40% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 215
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 211
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1321 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1321 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 94% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 466
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 58% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1225
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1207
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 54% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1224
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1206
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1365 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1365 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 93% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 466
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 54% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1262
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1239
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 50% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1262
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1238
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 308 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 308 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 78% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 109
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 21% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 239
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 235
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 27% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 239
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 235
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 152 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 152 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 92% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 49
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 27% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 139
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 136
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 22% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 138
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 135
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 61% |
State average from 613 schools: | 70% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 55% |
State average from 613 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 89% |
State average from 613 schools: | 92% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 34% |
State average from 613 schools: | 49% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 68% |
State average from 613 schools: | 66% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 67% |
State average from 613 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 75% |
State average from 613 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 70% |
State average from 613 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 519 |
State average from 613 schools: | 553 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 613 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: B
Grade in 2008: C
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 75% |
State average from 613 schools: | 52% |
Minority RateHere: | 95% |
State average from 613 schools: | 48% |
Region: 5
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1806 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1805 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientMIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 94% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 604
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 56% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1662
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1630
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 51% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1661
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1631
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 98 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 98 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 28
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 96
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 92
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 96
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 92
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 271 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 271 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 95
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 44% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 244
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 243
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 34% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 244
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 243
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1417 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1416 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 93% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 472
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientMIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 57% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1302
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1276
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 53% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1301
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1277
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1357 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1356 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 93% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 440
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 53% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1228
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1206
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 47% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1227
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1208
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 367 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 367 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 75% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 106
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 29% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 276
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 272
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 28% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 276
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 273
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 175 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 174 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 64
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 24% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 169
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 162
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientMIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 21% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 168
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 163
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingMIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 56% |
State average from 603 schools: | 69% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 49% |
State average from 603 schools: | 70% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 88% |
State average from 603 schools: | 88% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 29% |
State average from 602 schools: | 46% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 61% |
State average from 602 schools: | 65% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 63% |
State average from 602 schools: | 71% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 66% |
State average from 602 schools: | 64% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 67% |
State average from 602 schools: | 69% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 479 |
State average from 602 schools: | 543 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 604 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: C
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 74% |
State average from 605 schools: | 49% |
Minority RateMIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 94% |
State average from 605 schools: | 48% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1794 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1793 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 91% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 504
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 50% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1708
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1644
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 45% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1711
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1644
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 107 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 107 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 39
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 99
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 94
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 99
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 94
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 259 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 259 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 64
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 49% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 242
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 238
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 33% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 242
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 238
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1414 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1413 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 89% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 399
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 49% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1354
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1299
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 45% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1357
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1299
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1318 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1317 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 89% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 349
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 46% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1245
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1193
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 40% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1248
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1193
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 381 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 381 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 58% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 86
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 18% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 351
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 314
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 21% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 352
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 314
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 159 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 159 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 18% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 142
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 138
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 18% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 144
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 138
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2006-2007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 55% |
State average from 539 schools: | 64% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 49% |
State average from 539 schools: | 64% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 89% |
State average from 539 schools: | 91% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 36% |
State average from 538 schools: | 44% |
Making Reading GainsMIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 58% |
State average from 539 schools: | 61% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 61% |
State average from 539 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere: | 67% |
State average from 539 schools: | 64% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 63% |
State average from 539 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 ColumnsHere: | 478 |
State average from 539 schools: | 523 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 539 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 73% |
State average from 541 schools: | 49% |
Minority RateHere: | 93% |
State average from 542 schools: | 53% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1809 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1807 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientMIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 91% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 563
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 48% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1714
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 44% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1713
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 110 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 110 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 100% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 35
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 63% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 108
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 60% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 108
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 261 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 261 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 94% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 66
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 40% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 251
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 32% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 250
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1423 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1421 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 90% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 456
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 48% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1340
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 45% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1340
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1319 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1317 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 90% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 394
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 42% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1248
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 39% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1247
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 400 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 400 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 71% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 118
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 16% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 359
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 21% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 359
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 164 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 162 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 76% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 58
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 17% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 155
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientMIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 19% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 155
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2005-2006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 58% |
State average from 526 schools: | 64% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 51% |
State average from 526 schools: | 63% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingMIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 87% |
State average from 526 schools: | 89% |
Making Reading GainsHere: | 73% |
State average from 526 schools: | 66% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 68% |
State average from 526 schools: | 71% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere: | 74% |
State average from 526 schools: | 72% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsHere: | 411 |
State average from 526 schools: | 425 |
Percent TestedHere: | 99% |
State average from 526 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 75% |
State average from 525 schools: | 50% |
Minority RateHere: | 94% |
State average from 526 schools: | 52% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1718 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1718 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 92% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 564
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 49% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1630
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 45% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1630
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 109 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 109 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 97% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 33
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 68% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 106
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientMIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 63% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 106
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 246 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 246 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 89% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 83
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 42% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 234
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 30% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 233
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1350 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1350 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 92% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 445
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 49% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1277
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 45% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1278
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1283 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1283 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 90% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 400
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientMIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 43% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1211
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 40% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1210
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 370 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 370 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 71% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 105
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 16% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 341
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 21% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 342
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 160 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 161 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientMIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 82% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 61
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 13% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 156
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 10% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 157
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
2004-2005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 43% |
State average from 505 schools: | 59% |
Meeting High Standards in MathMIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 45% |
State average from 505 schools: | 60% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 81% |
State average from 506 schools: | 83% |
Making Reading GainsHere: | 64% |
State average from 505 schools: | 61% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 70% |
State average from 505 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere: | 72% |
State average from 505 schools: | 66% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsHere: | 375 |
State average from 506 schools: | 397 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 506 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 76% |
State average from 506 schools: | 51% |
Minority RateHere: | 94% |
State average from 506 schools: | 50% |
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1653 |
State average: | 1716 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 301 |
State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 25% |
State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 15% |
State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 31% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 21% |
State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 60% |
State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 7 |
State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1758 |
State average: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 307 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 23% |
State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 18% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 31% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 19% |
State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 58% |
State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1833 |
State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 299 |
State average: | 308 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 24% |
State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 2MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 29% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 30% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 15% |
State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 46% |
State average: | 52% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 293 |
State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 35% |
State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 33% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 24% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 32% |
State average: | 41% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1659 |
State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 307 |
State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 29% |
State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 21% |
State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 29% |
State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 4MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 15% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 50% |
State average: | 55% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1758 |
State average: | 1786 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 298 |
State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 28% |
State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 26% |
State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 29% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 13% |
State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 5MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 4% |
State average: | 7% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 46% |
State average: | 57% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 5 |
State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreMIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1868 |
State average: | 1892 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 313 |
State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 19% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 24% |
State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 37% |
State average: | 38% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 15% |
State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 5MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 6% |
State average: | 10% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 57% |
State average: | 64% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 6 |
State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 5 |
State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1634 |
State average: | 1707 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 297 |
State average: | 310 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1741 |
State average: | 1800 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 304 |
State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1835 |
State average: | 1864 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 299 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 284 |
State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1651 |
State average: | 1679 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 305 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1765 |
State average: | 1799 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 300 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1840 |
State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 306 |
State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 629
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 4 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 40%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 81%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreMIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1635 |
State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 298 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1677 |
State average: | 1775 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 292 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1803 |
State average: | 1857 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 293 |
State average: | 304 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 281 |
State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 26%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1614 |
State average: | 1670 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 296 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1728 |
State average: | 1801 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 291 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1850 |
State average: | 1882 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 309 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 648 |
State average: | 190 |
Mean Scale ScoreMIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 663 |
State average from 2604 schools: | 671 |
Informational (max 18)MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 12 |
State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 12 |
State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 7 |
State average: | 8 |
Interpretation (max 20)MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 14 |
State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 9 |
State average: | 9 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 626 |
State average: | 201 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 668 |
State average from 2487 schools: | 682 |
Functional (max 18)MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 11 |
State average: | 12 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 6 |
State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of StudentsMIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 527 |
State average: | 192 |
Mean Scale ScoreMIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 678 |
State average from 2497 schools: | 687 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 13 |
State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 525
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedMIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 278 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 41%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 81%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1599 |
State average from 878 schools: | 1661 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 291 |
State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1619 |
State average: | 1663 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1526 |
State average: | 1592 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 93
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1691 |
State average from 808 schools: | 1746 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 295 |
State average: | 305 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1723 |
State average: | 1743 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1638 |
State average: | 1668 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 85
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000MIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1768 |
State average from 819 schools: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 285 |
State average: | 294 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1790 |
State average: | 1807 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1683 |
State average: | 1738 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 107
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 276 |
State average: | 290 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1584 |
State average from 873 schools: | 1641 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 289 |
State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1598 |
State average: | 1645 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1604 |
State average: | 1620 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -6
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1733 |
State average from 804 schools: | 1777 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 292 |
State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1757 |
State average: | 1774 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1625 |
State average: | 1645 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 132
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1816 |
State average from 815 schools: | 1851 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 300 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1826 |
State average: | 1845 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1734 |
State average: | 1755 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 92
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 671
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 664 |
State average from 874 schools: | 671 |
Median NPR: 57
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 527
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 668 |
State average from 796 schools: | 675 |
Median NPR: 55
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 5
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 601
Mean Scale ScoreMIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 676 |
State average from 810 schools: | 685 |
Median NPR: 53
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 14): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 667
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 659 |
State average from 874 schools: | 669 |
Median NPR: 54
Number Sense (max 10): 5
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 527
Mean Scale ScoreMIAMI SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 674 |
State average from 796 schools: | 685 |
Median NPR: 61
Number Sense (max 9): 4
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 601
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 693 |
State average from 810 schools: | 698 |
Median NPR: 65
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 584
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 271 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 35%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 9
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 39%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 81%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 71%
- All Cities
- Florida forum
- Florida
- Miami Springs, FL
- Miami Springs Middle School in Miami Springs, Florida (FL)
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: