City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is
28.
Other nearby schools ratings:
Mariner Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida: | 45 |
Lee County: | 49 |
Cape Coral: | 57 |
Mariner Middle School: | 28 |
Discuss this school with others on our active
Florida forum
Phone: (239) 772-1848 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 36
School number: 722
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: LEE
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (239) 242-1256
Principal: Rachel Gould
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status: Title 1 school not in need of improvement
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 14
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 74
Senate District: 21
School Web Address: www.leeschools.net.schools/mrm
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 64% |
State average from 613 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 52% |
State average from 612 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 90% |
State average from 613 schools: | 88% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 43% |
State average from 612 schools: | 51% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 64% |
State average from 613 schools: | 64% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 62% |
State average from 612 schools: | 70% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 71% |
State average from 613 schools: | 62% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 72% |
State average from 613 schools: | 68% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)MARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 518 |
State average from 613 schools: | 545 |
Percent TestedHere: | 99% |
State average from 613 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: B
Grade in 2009: C
Grade in 2008: B
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 83% |
State average from 614 schools: | 56% |
Minority RateHere: | 44% |
State average from 614 schools: | 49% |
Region: 4
Title I: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 908 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 907 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 268
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 59% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 733
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 664
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 48% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 732
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 658
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 501 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 501 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 152
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 66% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 418
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 371
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 52% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 417
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 368
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 98 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 98 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 81
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 76
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 80
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 75
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 257 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 256 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 81
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 50% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 200
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 190
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 45% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 200
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 190
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 751 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 750 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 93% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 211
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 55% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 602
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 551
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 47% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 601
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 545
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 73 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 70 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 142 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 142 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 79% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 38
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientMARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 36% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 113
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 101
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 25% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 114
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 101
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingMARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 57% |
State average from 613 schools: | 70% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 52% |
State average from 613 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 90% |
State average from 613 schools: | 92% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 44% |
State average from 613 schools: | 49% |
Making Reading Gains MARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 58% |
State average from 613 schools: | 66% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 61% |
State average from 613 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 62% |
State average from 613 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 61% |
State average from 613 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 485 |
State average from 613 schools: | 553 |
Percent TestedHere: | 99% |
State average from 613 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: C
Grade in 2008: B
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 74% |
State average from 613 schools: | 52% |
Minority RateMARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 44% |
State average from 613 schools: | 48% |
Region: 4
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1013 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1010 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 94% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 287
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 52% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 811
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 725
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 47% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 803
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 721
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 559 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 559 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 94% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 160
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 55% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 454
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 394
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 50% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 450
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 394
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 99 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 98 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 80
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 74
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 78
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 73
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 283 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 282 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 80
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 47% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 216
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 204
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 45% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 215
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 203
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 746 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 744 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 93% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 198
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 47% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 586
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 526
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 42% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 579
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 522
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 83 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 83 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 57
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 57
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 147 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 147 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 82% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 44
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientMARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 23% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 115
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 107
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 21% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 113
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 106
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 59% |
State average from 603 schools: | 69% |
Meeting High Standards in MathMARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 59% |
State average from 603 schools: | 70% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 86% |
State average from 603 schools: | 88% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 40% |
State average from 602 schools: | 46% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 60% |
State average from 602 schools: | 65% |
Making Math GainsMARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 68% |
State average from 602 schools: | 71% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 60% |
State average from 602 schools: | 64% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathMARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 66% |
State average from 602 schools: | 69% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 498 |
State average from 602 schools: | 543 |
Percent TestedHere: | 99% |
State average from 604 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: B
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 64% |
State average from 605 schools: | 49% |
Minority RateHere: | 44% |
State average from 605 schools: | 48% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 858 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 856 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 92% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 325
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 52% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 801
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 712
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 52% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 799
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 710
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 481 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 481 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 185
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 54% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 457
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 401
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 57% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 458
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 403
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 64 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 63 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 50
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 258 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 257 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 86% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 101
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientMARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 52% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 237
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 215
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 51% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 236
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 213
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 538 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 535 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 91% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 186
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 47% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 500
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 443
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientMARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 49% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 497
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 440
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 80 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 80 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 66% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 32
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 71
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 71
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 113 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 112 (96%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientMARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 72% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 36
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 13% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 104
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 89
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 19% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 103
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 89
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2006-2007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 56% |
State average from 539 schools: | 64% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 60% |
State average from 539 schools: | 64% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 82% |
State average from 539 schools: | 91% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 40% |
State average from 538 schools: | 44% |
Making Reading GainsHere: | 56% |
State average from 539 schools: | 61% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 65% |
State average from 539 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere: | 64% |
State average from 539 schools: | 64% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 67% |
State average from 539 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 ColumnsMARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 490 |
State average from 539 schools: | 523 |
Percent TestedHere: | 99% |
State average from 539 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 50% |
State average from 541 schools: | 49% |
Minority RateHere: | 45% |
State average from 542 schools: | 53% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 943 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 942 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 93% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 367
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 48% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 864
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 53% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 860
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 516 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 517 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 97% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 193
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 53% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 481
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 59% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 482
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 50 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 50 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 320 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 319 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 86% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 137
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 42% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 293
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 45% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 288
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 481 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 481 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 87% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 169
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 38% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 424
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 43% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 422
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 121 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 121 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 71% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 58
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 17% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 109
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 21% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 107
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 116 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 116 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 87% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 39
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 17% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 100
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 99
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2005-2006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 57% |
State average from 526 schools: | 64% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 57% |
State average from 526 schools: | 63% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 80% |
State average from 526 schools: | 89% |
Making Reading GainsHere: | 62% |
State average from 526 schools: | 66% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 65% |
State average from 526 schools: | 71% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere: | 70% |
State average from 526 schools: | 72% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsHere: | 391 |
State average from 526 schools: | 425 |
Percent TestedHere: | 98% |
State average from 526 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 49% |
State average from 525 schools: | 50% |
Minority RateHere: | 44% |
State average from 526 schools: | 52% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1214 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1212 (98%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 91% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 357
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 49% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1027
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 50% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1025
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 674 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 672 (98%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 92% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 190
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 56% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 589
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 56% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 588
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 79 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 79 (99%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 29
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 36% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 67
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 39% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 66
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 399 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 399 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 89% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 118
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 38% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 321
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 40% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 322
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 595 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 594 (98%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 88% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 159
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 41% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 500
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 40% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 498
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 185 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 185 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 79% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 53
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 12% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 146
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 25% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 146
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 138 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 138 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 69% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 36
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 18% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 110
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 17% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 110
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
2004-2005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 53% |
State average from 505 schools: | 59% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 55% |
State average from 505 schools: | 60% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingMARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 69% |
State average from 506 schools: | 83% |
Making Reading GainsHere: | 56% |
State average from 505 schools: | 61% |
Making Math GainsMARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 64% |
State average from 505 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere: | 58% |
State average from 505 schools: | 66% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsHere: | 355 |
State average from 506 schools: | 397 |
Percent TestedHere: | 99% |
State average from 506 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 47% |
State average from 506 schools: | 51% |
Minority RateHere: | 38% |
State average from 506 schools: | 50% |
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1663 |
State average: | 1716 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 303 |
State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1MARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 18% |
State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 2MARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 21% |
State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 36% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 21% |
State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 61% |
State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1781 |
State average: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500MARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 312 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 16% |
State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 22% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 38% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 18% |
State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 62% |
State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1853 |
State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 303 |
State average: | 308 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 18% |
State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 30% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 41% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 10% |
State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 51% |
State average: | 52% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500MARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 304 |
State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 24% |
State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 2MARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 40% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 29% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 36% |
State average: | 41% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1600 |
State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 293 |
State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 34% |
State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 29% |
State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 25% |
State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 36% |
State average: | 55% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1726 |
State average: | 1786 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500MARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 290 |
State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 33% |
State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 28% |
State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 27% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 10% |
State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 39% |
State average: | 57% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1874 |
State average: | 1892 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500MARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 315 |
State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 15% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2MARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 27% |
State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 41% |
State average: | 38% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 14% |
State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 58% |
State average: | 64% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1611 |
State average: | 1707 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 293 |
State average: | 310 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1720 |
State average: | 1800 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 300 |
State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1827 |
State average: | 1864 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 298 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 294 |
State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1600 |
State average: | 1679 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 293 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1755 |
State average: | 1799 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 298 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1859 |
State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 311 |
State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 345
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 4 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 37%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 84%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1581 |
State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 288 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1731 |
State average: | 1775 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 302 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1847 |
State average: | 1857 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 302 |
State average: | 304 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 299 |
State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1611 |
State average: | 1670 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 295 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1756 |
State average: | 1801 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 298 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1871 |
State average: | 1882 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 314 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of StudentsMARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 264 |
State average: | 190 |
Mean Scale ScoreMARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 657 |
State average from 2604 schools: | 671 |
Informational (max 18)MARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 11 |
State average: | 12 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 278 |
State average: | 201 |
Mean Scale ScoreMARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 674 |
State average from 2487 schools: | 682 |
Median NPRMARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 60 |
State average: | 66 |
Literary (max 18)MARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 13 |
State average: | 14 |
Informational (max 18)MARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 12 |
State average: | 12 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 346 |
State average: | 192 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 682 |
State average from 2497 schools: | 687 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)MARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 7 |
State average: | 7 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)MARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 7 |
State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 352
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 270 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 32%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 39%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 80%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1574 |
State average from 878 schools: | 1661 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 287 |
State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 83%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1592 |
State average: | 1663 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1570 |
State average: | 1592 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 21
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1729 |
State average from 808 schools: | 1746 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500MARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 302 |
State average: | 305 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1738 |
State average: | 1743 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1672 |
State average: | 1668 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 65
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1796 |
State average from 819 schools: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 291 |
State average: | 294 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1809 |
State average: | 1807 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1708 |
State average: | 1738 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 101
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 291 |
State average: | 290 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1594 |
State average from 873 schools: | 1641 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 291 |
State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 84%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1611 |
State average: | 1645 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1644 |
State average: | 1620 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -33
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1774 |
State average from 804 schools: | 1777 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 302 |
State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1782 |
State average: | 1774 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1690 |
State average: | 1645 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 92
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1842 |
State average from 815 schools: | 1851 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 307 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1851 |
State average: | 1845 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1758 |
State average: | 1755 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 92
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 223
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 661 |
State average from 874 schools: | 671 |
Median NPR: 54
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 319
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 672 |
State average from 796 schools: | 675 |
Median NPR: 58
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 5
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 398
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 682 |
State average from 810 schools: | 685 |
Median NPR: 60
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 14): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 223
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 662 |
State average from 874 schools: | 669 |
Median NPR: 57
Number Sense (max 10): 5
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 317
Mean Scale ScoreMARINER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 682 |
State average from 796 schools: | 685 |
Median NPR: 67
Number Sense (max 9): 4
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 399
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 694 |
State average from 810 schools: | 698 |
Median NPR: 66
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 395
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 263 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 30%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 9
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 41%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 76%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 60%
- All Cities
- Florida forum
- Florida
- Cape Coral, FL
- Mariner Middle School in Cape Coral, Florida (FL)
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: