Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Kipp Intrepid Preparatory School in Houston, TX
(05-08 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 53
Address
 5402 LAWNDALE ST
Houston, TX 77023
Telephone
(281) 879-3100
(make sure to verify first before calling)
City-data.com school rating
53
Students
406
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
24.3
Free lunch eligible students
339
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
43
School district
KIPP INC CHARTER
Charter school
Yes
Charter authorizer name
STATE BOARD OF (#000001)
Title I status
Title I schoolwide school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
PROJECT CHRYSALIS MIDDLE (0.9 miles):

99
KIPP EXPLORE ACADEMY (0.0 miles):

75
EASTWOOD ACADEMY (0.7 miles):

70
CARRILLO EL (0.7 miles):

69
HENDERSON J EL (0.4 miles):

58
CAGE EL (0.9 miles):

57
Kipp Intrepid Preparatory School:

53
NAVARRO MIDDLE (0.6 miles):

17
AUSTIN H S (0.7 miles):

10
Kipp Intrepid Preparatory School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Harris County:

51
Houston:

47
Kipp Intrepid Preparatory School:

53

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 406
Enrollment in 2015: 407
Enrollment in 2014: 303
Enrollment in 2013: 306
Enrollment in 2012: 275
Enrollment in 2011: 180
Enrollment in 2010: 95

Kipp Intrepid Preparatory School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
GradeG05G06G07G08Total
All students10410710887406
Female students56525742207
Male students48555145199
Hispanic students10310710487401
Black students1 - 2 - 3
White students - - 2 - 2

Enrollment by grade:
5th grade enrollment: 104
6th grade enrollment: 107
7th grade enrollment: 108
8th grade enrollment: 87

Kipp Intrepid Preparatory School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Female enrollment: 207 (51.0%)
Here:

51.0%
State:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 199 (49.0%)
Kipp Intrepid Preparatory School:

49.0%
State:

50.1%

Kipp Intrepid Preparatory School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Hispanic enrollment: 401 (98.8%)
School:

98.8%
Texas:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 3 (0.7%)
Here:

0.7%
Texas:

11.6%
White enrollment: 2 (0.5%)
Kipp Intrepid Preparatory School:

0.5%
Texas:

32.3%

Kipp Intrepid Preparatory School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 382 (94.1%)
School:

94.1%
Texas:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 339 (83.5%)
School:

83.5%
Texas:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 43 (10.6%)
Here:

10.6%
Texas:

6.2%

Kipp Intrepid Preparatory School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE): 24.3

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 3
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 4
Number of FTE school counselors: 1
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 5
Number of FTE nurses: 1

Student/Teacher Ratio
Here:

16.7
Texas:

15.6

Kipp Intrepid Preparatory School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $1,251,088
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 24 (Salary Expenditures: $1,070,761)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 4 (Salary Expenditures: $180,327)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $428,019
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $0
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $1,098,913
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 4 (Salary Expenditures: $180,327)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $437,030

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 124 (male: 68, female: 56)
  • Hispanic: 124 (male: 68, female: 56)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 10 (male: 8, female: 2)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for
Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 26 (male: 16, female: 10)
  • Hispanic: 26 (male: 16, female: 10)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 11 (male: 7, female: 4)
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 30 (male: 23, female: 7)
  • Hispanic: 28 (male: 23, female: 5)
  • White: 2 (all female)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 10 (male: 8, female: 2)

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 1,054 schools)
A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in 6th grade: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)

Percent of 6th grade students retained
Kipp Intrepid Preparatory School:

3.7%
Texas:

4.1%
Total number of students retained in 7th grade: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Percent of 7th grade students retained
School:

3.7%
State:

6.1%
Total number of students retained in 8th grade: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Percent of 8th grade students retained
Here:

4.6%
State:

7.2%

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,265 schools)
The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
End-of-course (EOC)

    Algebra I Average Scale Score

  • All3,949
  • Males3,892
  • Females4,017
  • Hispanic3,949
Algebra I Average Scale Score:

3,949
Texas:

4,001
Algebra I students tested: 95
Algebra I # Answer Documents Submitted: 95

Algebra I Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.3 (58%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.9 (58%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.4 (53%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 5.7 (52%)
  • Reporting Category 5: 3.7 (61%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 38%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 21%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 18%

23%
38%
21%
18%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,892, Tested: 52, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 15%)
29%
34%
22%
15%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,017, Tested: 43, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 42%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 21%)
16%
42%
21%
21%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,949, Tested: 95, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 18%)
23%
38%
21%
18%
5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,705
  • Males1,692
  • Females1,716
  • Hispanic1,705
Math Average Scale Score:

1,705
State:

1,603
Math students tested: 112
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 112

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.4 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 13.5 (79%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.2 (79%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.1 (77%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 17%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 33%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 46%

4%
17%
33%
46%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,692, Tested: 50, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 32%, Masters: 42%)
6%
20%
32%
42%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,716, Tested: 62, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 3%, Approaches: 13%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 50%)
3%
13%
34%
50%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,705, Tested: 107, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 46%)
5%
16%
33%
46%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,565
  • Males1,550
  • Females1,577
  • Hispanic1,564
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,565
Texas:

1,546
Reading students tested: 112
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 112

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.6 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.5 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9 (64%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 28%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 26%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 24%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 22%

28%
26%
24%
22%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,550, Tested: 50, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 34%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 18%)
34%
28%
20%
18%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,577, Tested: 62, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 26%)
23%
25%
26%
26%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,564, Tested: 107, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 22%)
27%
27%
24%
22%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All3,578
  • Males3,602
  • Females3,558
  • Hispanic3,564
Science Average Scale Score:

3,578
Texas:

3,771
Science students tested: 112
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 112

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.6 (60%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.2 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.3 (53%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 7.1 (59%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 51%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 33%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 10%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 6%

51%
33%
10%
6%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,602, Tested: 50, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 4%)
50%
30%
16%
4%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,558, Tested: 62, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 52%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 5%, Masters: 8%)
52%
35%
5%
8%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,564, Tested: 107, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 52%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 8%, Masters: 7%)
52%
33%
8%
7%
6th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,645
  • Males1,666
  • Females1,617
  • Hispanic1,644
Math Average Scale Score:

1,645
Texas:

1,546
Math students tested: 102
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 102

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.7 (57%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.3 (55%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 3.5 (59%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.8 (54%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 35%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 20%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 23%

22%
35%
20%
23%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,666, Tested: 57, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 23%)
16%
33%
28%
23%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,617, Tested: 45, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 22%)
29%
38%
11%
22%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,644, Tested: 101, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 23%)
22%
35%
20%
23%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,593
  • Males1,571
  • Females1,620
  • Hispanic1,593
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,593
State:

1,457
Reading students tested: 102
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 102

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.2 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.2 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.7 (65%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 41%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 13%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 21%

25%
41%
13%
21%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,571, Tested: 57, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 28%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 14%)
28%
39%
19%
14%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,620, Tested: 45, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%, Approaches: 42%, Meets: 7%, Masters: 29%)
22%
42%
7%
29%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,593, Tested: 101, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 21%)
26%
39%
14%
21%
7th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All1,669
  • Males1,651
  • Females1,682
  • Hispanic1,667
Math Average Scale Score:

1,669
State:

1,571
Math students tested: 98
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 98

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.9 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.5 (57%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.5 (54%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.8 (54%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 32%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 26%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 16%

26%
32%
26%
16%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,651, Tested: 42, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 17%)
33%
31%
19%
17%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,682, Tested: 56, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 16%)
20%
34%
30%
16%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,667, Tested: 97, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 15%)
26%
33%
26%
15%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All1,674
  • Males1,644
  • Females1,696
  • Hispanic1,673
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,674
State:

1,550
Reading students tested: 98
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 98

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.8 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.8 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.9 (68%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 32%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 26%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 26%

16%
32%
26%
26%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,644, Tested: 42, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 17%)
21%
34%
28%
17%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,696, Tested: 56, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 32%)
13%
31%
25%
32%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,673, Tested: 97, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 25%)
16%
32%
27%
25%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All3,779
  • Males3,657
  • Females3,871
  • Hispanic3,780
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,779
State:

3,515
Writing students tested: 98
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 98

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 7.7 (48%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.9 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 11.9 (70%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 43%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 21%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 9%

27%
43%
21%
9%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,657, Tested: 42, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 41%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 7%)
38%
41%
14%
7%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,871, Tested: 56, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 46%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 11%)
18%
46%
25%
11%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,780, Tested: 97, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 9%)
27%
43%
21%
9%
8th Grade
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 91

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All1,706
  • Males1,684
  • Females1,732
  • Hispanic1,706
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,706
Texas:

1,561
Reading students tested: 96
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 96

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.9 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 14.3 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 12.1 (71%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 32%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 22%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 30%

16%
32%
22%
30%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,684, Tested: 52, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 19%)
19%
31%
31%
19%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,732, Tested: 44, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 43%)
11%
34%
12%
43%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,706, Tested: 96, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 30%)
16%
32%
22%
30%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All3,943
  • Males3,905
  • Females3,989
  • Hispanic3,943
Science Average Scale Score:

3,943
State:

3,634
Science students tested: 96
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 96

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 7 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6 (66%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.7 (61%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 7.8 (71%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 28%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 24%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 21%

27%
28%
24%
21%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,905, Tested: 52, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 19%)
27%
23%
31%
19%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,989, Tested: 44, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 23%)
27%
34%
16%
23%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,943, Tested: 96, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 21%)
27%
28%
24%
21%

    Social Studies Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All3,877
  • Males3,894
  • Females3,858
  • Hispanic3,877
Social Studies Average Scale Score:

3,877
State:

3,461
Social Studies students tested: 96
Social Studies # Answer Documents Submitted: 96

Social Studies Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 10.9 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.9 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.2 (62%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 4.3 (61%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 31%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 19%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 23%

27%
31%
19%
23%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,894, Tested: 52, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 23%)
23%
33%
21%
23%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,858, Tested: 44, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 32%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 23%)
32%
29%
16%
23%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,877, Tested: 96, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 23%)
27%
31%
19%
23%

Health & Safety


Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)
Out-of-school suspension
  • For students with disabilities served under IDEA : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his/her regular school for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes to another setting (e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include both removals in which no individualized family service plan(IFSP) or individualized education plan(IEP) services are provided because the removal is 10 days or less as well as removals in which the child continues to receive services according to his/her IFSP or IEP.
  • For students without disabilities and students with disabilities served solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his / her regular school for at least half a day(but less than the remainder of the school year) for disciplinary purposes to another setting(e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include removals in which no educational services are provided, and removals in which educational services are provided(e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring).
In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.

    School days missed due to out-of-school suspension

  • Hispanic38
  • Black2
  • LEP19
  • IDEA5
  • 5047
School days missed due to out-of-school suspension: 40 (male: 36, female: 4)
  • Hispanic: 38 (male: 34, female: 4)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 19 (male: 18, female: 1)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 5 (all male)
  • Section 504: 7 (all male)
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students without disabilities): 30

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students without disabilities)
School:

73.9
Texas:

102.7
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
  • Hispanic: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 21 (male: 16, female: 5)
  • Hispanic: 19 (male: 14, female: 5)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 10 (male: 8, female: 2)
Students without disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 5 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 5
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 5
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students with disabilities): 5

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students with disabilities)
Kipp Intrepid Preparatory School:

12.3
Texas:

27.5
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Section 504 only): 16

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Section 504 only)
Here:

39.4
State:

12.0
Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 7
  • Section 504: 7
Students with disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
  • Section 504: 2
Students with disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
  • Section 504: 5

Classes & Courses


Algebra I:
Show data for

(State average from 1,291 schools)
Algebra I is a (college-preparatory) course that includes the study of properties and operations of the real number system; evaluating rational algebraic expressions; solving and graphing first degree equations and inequalities; translating word problems into equations; operations with and factoring of polynomials; and solving simple quadratic equations. Algebra I is a foundation course leading to higher-level mathematics courses, including Geometry and Algebra II.
8th grade student enrollment in Algebra I: 85 (male: 44, female: 41)
  • Hispanic: 85 (male: 44, female: 41)
8th grade studenst who passed Algebra I: 74 (male: 34, female: 40)
  • Hispanic: 74 (male: 34, female: 40)
Percent of 8th grade students who passed
Kipp Intrepid Preparatory School:

87.1%
State:

87.0%

Comments

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss Houston, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.

  1. All Cities
  2. Texas
  3. Houston main city page
  4. Schools in Texas
  5. Kipp Intrepid Preparatory School


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents