Frank Lanterman School in Los Angeles, CA
(06-12 • Public • Special Education School)
- Address
- 2328 Saint James Pl.
Los Angeles, CA 90007
- Telephone
- (213) 749-8310
(make sure to verify first before calling)
- Students
- 128
- Classroom Teachers (FTE)
- 14.5
- National School Lunch
Program (NSLP) Status - Yes, under Community Eligibility Option (CEO)
- Free lunch eligible students
- 97
- Reduced-price lunch
eligible students - 14
- School district
- Los Angeles Unified
- Charter school
- No
- Title I status
- Title I schoolwide school
- Magnet School Indicator
- No
- Shared Time Indicator
- Missing
- Adult education offered
- No
Students & Teachers
Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 128
Enrollment in 2015: 179
Enrollment in 2014: 207
Enrollment in 2013: 229
Enrollment in 2012: 223
Enrollment in 2011: 229
Enrollment in 2010: 223
Enrollment in 2009: 234
Enrollment in 2008: 236
Enrollment in 2007: 218
Enrollment in 2006: 218
Enrollment in 2005: 218
Enrollment in 2004: 195
Enrollment in 2003: 216
Enrollment in 2002: 225
Enrollment in 2001: 229
Enrollment in 2000: 239
Enrollment in 1999: 229
Enrollment in 2015: 179
Enrollment in 2014: 207
Enrollment in 2013: 229
Enrollment in 2012: 223
Enrollment in 2011: 229
Enrollment in 2010: 223
Enrollment in 2009: 234
Enrollment in 2008: 236
Enrollment in 2007: 218
Enrollment in 2006: 218
Enrollment in 2005: 218
Enrollment in 2004: 195
Enrollment in 2003: 216
Enrollment in 2002: 225
Enrollment in 2001: 229
Enrollment in 2000: 239
Enrollment in 1999: 229
Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
Grade | G07 | G08 | G09 | G10 | G11 | G12 | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
All students | 6 | 22 | 17 | 21 | 31 | 31 | 128 |
Female students | 3 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 12 | 11 | 48 |
Male students | 3 | 15 | 9 | 14 | 19 | 20 | 80 |
Asian students | - | - | - | 3 | 5 | - | 8 |
Hispanic students | 6 | 19 | 13 | 16 | 24 | 29 | 107 |
Black students | - | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 10 |
White students | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | 1 | 3 |
Enrollment by grade:
7th grade enrollment: 6
8th grade enrollment: 22
9th grade enrollment: 17
10th grade enrollment: 21
11th grade enrollment: 31
12th grade enrollment: 31
8th grade enrollment: 22
9th grade enrollment: 17
10th grade enrollment: 21
11th grade enrollment: 31
12th grade enrollment: 31
Frank Lanterman School - Historical enrollment by grade
Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 12,430 schools)
Female enrollment: 48 (37.5%)
School: | 37.5% |
California: | 49.4% |
Male enrollment: 80 (62.5%)
Here: | 62.5% |
State: | 49.6% |
Frank Lanterman School - Historical enrollment by gender
Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 12,430 schools)
Asian enrollment: 8 (6.3%)
Here: | 6.3% |
California: | 9.4% |
Hispanic enrollment: 107 (83.6%)
Frank Lanterman School: | 83.6% |
State: | 46.0% |
Black enrollment: 10 (7.8%)
Frank Lanterman School: | 7.8% |
State: | 6.1% |
White enrollment: 3 (2.3%)
Here: | 2.3% |
California: | 28.3% |
Frank Lanterman School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity
Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 10,111 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 111 (86.7%)
Frank Lanterman School: | 86.7% |
California: | 61.2% |
Free lunch eligible students: 97 (75.8%)
Here: | 75.8% |
California: | 52.8% |
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 14 (10.9%)
Frank Lanterman School: | 10.9% |
California: | 8.6% |
Frank Lanterman School - Lunch Program Eligibility
Teachers and support:
(State average from 12,394 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE): 14.5
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 0.5
Number of FTE sworn law enforcement officers: 0.5
Number of FTE psychologists: 2
Student/Teacher Ratio
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 0.5
Number of FTE sworn law enforcement officers: 0.5
Number of FTE psychologists: 2
Student/Teacher Ratio
Here: | 8.8 |
State: | 22.8 |
Frank Lanterman School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio
School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $56,247
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 1 (Salary Expenditures: $25,086)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 0.2 (Salary Expenditures: $84,488)
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $3,363,476
- Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $1,217,869
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 38.2 (Salary Expenditures: $1,539,878)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 1.8 (Salary Expenditures: $308,015)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 5.8 (Salary Expenditures: $297,713)
Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for
- Hispanic100
- Asian7
- White4
- IDEA106
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs
- Hispanic: 100 (male: 62, female: 38)
- Asian: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
- White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 106 (male: 68, female: 38)
Students with disabilities:
Show data for
Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.
- Hispanic107
- Asian7
- Black7
- LEP107
Students with disabilities served under IDEA
- Hispanic: 107 (male: 67, female: 40)
- Asian: 7 (all male)
- Black: 7 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 107 (male: 67, female: 40)
Retention:
Show data for
(State average from 709 schools)
A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in 9th grade: 2 (all female)
Percent of 9th grade students retained
Total number of students retained in 12th grade: 21 (male: 11, female: 10)
Percent of 12th grade students retained
- Hispanic: 2
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2
Percent of 9th grade students retained
School: | 11.8% |
California: | 24.2% |
- Hispanic19
- Black2
- LEP19
- IDEA19
Total number of students retained in 12th grade
- Hispanic: 19 (male: 11, female: 8)
- Black: 2 (all female)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 19 (male: 11, female: 8)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 19 (male: 11, female: 8)
Percent of 12th grade students retained
Here: | 67.7% |
California: | 16.7% |
Statewide Student Assessments
California Alternate Assessments:
Show data for
(State average from 1,579 schools)
The new California Alternate Assessments (CAAs) are based on alternate achievement standards-called the Core Content Connectors-and linked to the Common Core State Standards. The CAAs are online tests for students with an individualized education program (IEP) that designates the use of an alternate assessment to measure student progress on alternate achievement standards. This alternate assessment is part of the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) System and replaces the California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA) for English language arts and mathematics.
ELA students tested: 26
ELA students with scores: 26
Level 1: 96.2% The student showed limited understanding of core concepts.
Level 2: 3.9% The student showed foundational understanding of core concepts.
Level 3: 0.0% The student showed understanding of core concepts.
11th Grade: (Mean Scale Score: 911.9, Students tested: 15, Level1: 93.3%, Level 2: 6.7%, Level 3: 0.0%)
Math students tested: 26
Math students with scores: 26
Level 1: 100.0% The student showed limited understanding of core concepts.
Level 2: 0.0% The student showed foundational understanding of core concepts.
Level 3: 0.0% The student showed understanding of core concepts.
11th Grade: (Mean Scale Score: 906.9, Students tested: 15, Level1: 100.0%, Level 2: 0.0%, Level 3: 0.0%)
ELA students with scores: 26
Percentage Level 3: | 0% |
California: | 15% |
Level 1: 96.2% The student showed limited understanding of core concepts.
Level 2: 3.9% The student showed foundational understanding of core concepts.
Level 3: 0.0% The student showed understanding of core concepts.
11th Grade: (Mean Scale Score: 911.9, Students tested: 15, Level1: 93.3%, Level 2: 6.7%, Level 3: 0.0%)
Math students tested: 26
Math students with scores: 26
Percentage Level 3: | 0% |
California: | 6% |
Level 1: 100.0% The student showed limited understanding of core concepts.
Level 2: 0.0% The student showed foundational understanding of core concepts.
Level 3: 0.0% The student showed understanding of core concepts.
11th Grade: (Mean Scale Score: 906.9, Students tested: 15, Level1: 100.0%, Level 2: 0.0%, Level 3: 0.0%)
Paper-based CAASPP:
Show data for
(State average from 1,311 schools)
California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) System includes paper-based tests:
California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA) - Students with significant cognitive disabilities who are unable to take the Smarter Balanced Field Test even with designated supports and accommodations participated in the CAASPP system by taking the CAPA. The CAPA is an individually administered performance assessment with all tasks linked to the California ELA, mathematics, and science content standards.
California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA) - Students with significant cognitive disabilities who are unable to take the Smarter Balanced Field Test even with designated supports and accommodations participated in the CAASPP system by taking the CAPA. The CAPA is an individually administered performance assessment with all tasks linked to the California ELA, mathematics, and science content standards.
CAPA Science students tested: 40
CAPA Science students with scores: 40
Percentage Far Below Basic: 17.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.
Percentage Below Basic: 13.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.
Percentage Basic: 5.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.
Percentage Proficient: 28.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.
Percentage Advanced: 38.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.
: (Mean Scale Score: 33.0, Students tested: 40, Far Below Basic: 17.0%, Below Basic: 13.0%, Basic: 5.0%, Proficient: 28.0%, Advanced: 38.0%)
CAPA Science students with scores: 40
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 65% |
State: | 67% |
Percentage Far Below Basic: 17.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.
Percentage Below Basic: 13.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.
Percentage Basic: 5.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.
Percentage Proficient: 28.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.
Percentage Advanced: 38.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.
: (Mean Scale Score: 33.0, Students tested: 40, Far Below Basic: 17.0%, Below Basic: 13.0%, Basic: 5.0%, Proficient: 28.0%, Advanced: 38.0%)
The Physical Fitness Test:
Show data for
The Physical Fitness Test (PFT) for students in California schools is the FITNESSGRAM. The main goal of the test is to help students in starting life-long habits of regular physical activity.
Aerobic Capacity:
9th grade: (Students tested: 17, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 0.0%, Needs Improvement: 64.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 35.3%)
Body Composition:
9th grade: (Students tested: 17, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 35.3%, Needs Improvement: 29.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 35.3%)
Abdominal Strength:
9th grade: (Students tested: 17, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 0.0%, Needs Improvement: 100.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:
9th grade: (Students tested: 17, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 11.8%, Needs Improvement: 88.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:
9th grade: (Students tested: 17, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 0.0%, Needs Improvement: 100.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:
9th grade: (Students tested: 17, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 11.8%, Needs Improvement: 88.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
9th grade: (Students tested: 17, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 0.0%, Needs Improvement: 64.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 35.3%)
Body Composition:
9th grade: (Students tested: 17, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 35.3%, Needs Improvement: 29.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 35.3%)
Abdominal Strength:
9th grade: (Students tested: 17, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 0.0%, Needs Improvement: 100.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:
9th grade: (Students tested: 17, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 11.8%, Needs Improvement: 88.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:
9th grade: (Students tested: 17, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 0.0%, Needs Improvement: 100.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:
9th grade: (Students tested: 17, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 11.8%, Needs Improvement: 88.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Accountability
Adequate Yearly Progress:
Show data for
(State average from 9,846 schools)
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) - Accountability system mandated by federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Statistics are based on test results of the Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program, the California High School Exit Examination (CAHSEE), and the California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA).
Frank Lanterman School - Adequate Yearly Progress status
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria possible: 3
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
Attendance rate (calculated by using number of days attended and enrolled) : 85
Met Attendance rate Target: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: No
ELA Participation Rate
Met Math Participation Rate: No
Math Participation Rate
Number of AYP criteria possible: 3
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
Attendance rate (calculated by using number of days attended and enrolled) : 85
Met Attendance rate Target: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: No
ELA Participation Rate
Frank Lanterman School: | 73.0% |
State: | 95.2% |
- Hispanic75
- Asian100
- Black60
- White34
- SED74
- LEP78
- With Disabilities73
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic: 75% (tested 33 out of 44 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Black: 60% (tested 3 out of 5 enrolled)
- White: 34% (tested 1 out of 3 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 74% (tested 34 out of 46 enrolled)
- English Learners: 78% (tested 34 out of 44 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 73% (tested 39 out of 54 enrolled)
Met Math Participation Rate: No
Math Participation Rate
Here: | 49.0% |
State: | 94.9% |
- Hispanic46
- Asian100
- Black60
- White34
- SED53
- LEP48
- With Disabilities49
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic: 46% (tested 20 out of 44 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Black: 60% (tested 3 out of 5 enrolled)
- White: 34% (tested 1 out of 3 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 53% (tested 24 out of 46 enrolled)
- English Learners: 48% (tested 21 out of 44 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 49% (tested 26 out of 54 enrolled)
Health & Safety
Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for
(State average from 8,737 schools)
A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.
- Hispanic61
- Asian7
- Black4
- White2
- LEP64
- IDEA73
Chronic Student Absenteeism
- Hispanic: 61 (male: 38, female: 23)
- Asian: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
- Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- White: 2 (all female)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 64 (male: 41, female: 23)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 73 (male: 47, female: 26)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
Here: | 578.1 |
State: | 172.7 |
Restraint and Seclusion:
Show data for
(State average from 741 schools)
Physical restraint refers to a personal restriction that immobilizes or reduces the ability of a student to move his or her torso, arms, legs, or head freely. The term physical restraint does not include a physical escort. Physical escort means a temporary touching or holding of the hand, wrist, arm, shoulder or back for the purpose of inducing a student who is acting out to walk to a safe location.
Total Number of students with disabilities (IDEA) subjected to physical restraint: 2 (all male)
Students with disabilities (IDEA) subjected to physical restraint per 1,000 students
- Black: 2
Students with disabilities (IDEA) subjected to physical restraint per 1,000 students
Here: | 15.6 |
California: | 11.7 |
Discuss Los Angeles, California (CA) on our hugely popular California forum.
Comments
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: