Alfred S. Madrid Middle School in El Monte, CA
(06-08 • Public • Regular School)
City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in California) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 26
- Address
- 3300 Gilman Rd.
EL MONTE, CA 91732
- Telephone
- (626) 652-4300
(make sure to verify first before calling)
- Website
- http://madrid.mtviewschools.com
- City-data.com school rating
- 26
- Students
- 844
- Classroom Teachers (FTE)
- 40.1
- National School Lunch
Program (NSLP) Status - Yes, under Provision 2
- Free lunch eligible students
- 672
- Reduced-price lunch
eligible students - 100
- School district
- Mountain View Elementary
- Charter school
- No
- Title I status
- Title I schoolwide school
- Magnet School Indicator
- No
- Shared Time Indicator
- Missing
- Adult education offered
- No
No street view available for this location
Ratings
This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
Alfred S. Madrid Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:California: | 46 |
Los Angeles County: | 44 |
El Monte: | 35 |
Alfred S. Madrid Middle School: | 26 |
Students & Teachers
Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 844
Enrollment in 2015: 844
Enrollment in 2014: 862
Enrollment in 2013: 877
Enrollment in 2012: 897
Enrollment in 2011: 1,055
Enrollment in 2010: 1,102
Enrollment in 2009: 1,105
Enrollment in 2008: 1,125
Enrollment in 2007: 1,184
Enrollment in 2006: 1,277
Enrollment in 2005: 1,311
Enrollment in 2004: 1,282
Enrollment in 2003: 1,242
Enrollment in 2002: 1,188
Enrollment in 2001: 1,124
Enrollment in 2000: 1,085
Enrollment in 1999: 1,005
Alfred S. Madrid Middle School - Historical enrollment
Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
Grade | G06 | G07 | G08 | Total |
---|
All students | 243 | 322 | 279 | 844 |
Female students | 121 | 155 | 125 | 401 |
Male students | 122 | 167 | 154 | 443 |
American Indian/Alaska Native students | - | - | 1 | 1 |
Asian students | 16 | 32 | 20 | 68 |
Hispanic students | 224 | 287 | 257 | 768 |
Black students | - | 1 | - | 1 |
Two or More Races students | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
Enrollment by grade:
6th grade enrollment: 243
7th grade enrollment: 322
8th grade enrollment: 279
Alfred S. Madrid Middle School - Historical enrollment by grade
Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 12,430 schools)
Female enrollment: 401 (47.5%)Alfred S. Madrid Middle School: | 47.5% |
California: | 49.4% |
Male enrollment: 443 (52.5%)School: | 52.5% |
California: | 49.6% |
Alfred S. Madrid Middle School - Historical enrollment by gender
Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 12,430 schools)
American Indian/Alaska Native enrollment: 1 (0.1%)School: | 0.1% |
California: | 1.0% |
Asian enrollment: 68 (8.1%)
Hispanic enrollment: 768 (91.0%)
Black enrollment: 1 (0.1%)School: | 0.1% |
California: | 6.1% |
Two or More Races enrollment: 6 (0.7%)Alfred S. Madrid Middle School: | 0.7% |
State: | 4.5% |
Alfred S. Madrid Middle School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity
Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 10,111 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 772 (91.5%)Alfred S. Madrid Middle School: | 91.5% |
State: | 61.2% |
Free lunch eligible students: 672 (79.6%)Alfred S. Madrid Middle School: | 79.6% |
California: | 52.8% |
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 100 (11.8%)School: | 11.8% |
California: | 8.6% |
Alfred S. Madrid Middle School - Lunch Program Eligibility
Teachers and support:
(State average from 12,394 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE): 40.1
Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 2
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 1
Number of FTE school counselors: 1
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 6
Number of FTE security guards: 2.5
Number of FTE nurses: 0.4
Number of FTE psychologists: 0.4
Student/Teacher RatioAlfred S. Madrid Middle School: | 21.0 |
State: | 22.8 |
Alfred S. Madrid Middle School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio
School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds:
$3,893,846- Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 41 (Salary Expenditures: $3,165,848)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 1.5 (Salary Expenditures: $68,311)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 4.8 (Salary Expenditures: $356,826)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 5 (Salary Expenditures: $376,894)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds:
$261,041Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,:
$4,658,776- Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $3,760,790
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 6 (Salary Expenditures: $222,133)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 6.1 (Salary Expenditures: $387,641)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 5 (Salary Expenditures: $376,894)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds:
$495,578 Limited English Proficiency:
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs
- Hispanic349
- Asian10
- White2
- IDEA88
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 361 (male: 199, female: 162)
- Hispanic: 349 (male: 194, female: 155)
- Asian: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
- White: 2 (all female)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 88 (male: 56, female: 32)
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs
- Hispanic352
- Asian7
- White2
- IDEA88
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 361 (male: 195, female: 166)
- Hispanic: 352 (male: 191, female: 161)
- Asian: 7 (male: 2, female: 5)
- White: 2 (all male)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 88 (male: 56, female: 32)
Students with disabilities:
Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.
Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 122 (male: 79, female: 43)
- Hispanic: 122 (male: 79, female: 43)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 92 (male: 58, female: 34)
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 120 (male: 86, female: 34)
- Hispanic: 116 (male: 82, female: 34)
- Asian: 4 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 92 (male: 58, female: 34)
Gifted and Talented:
(State average from 5,551 schools)
This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment
- Hispanic31
- Asian22
- Native Hawaiian2
- White2
- IDEA2
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 57 (male: 27, female: 30)
- Hispanic: 31 (male: 17, female: 14)
- Asian: 22 (male: 8, female: 14)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 2 (all male)
- White: 2 (all female)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 58 (male: 31, female: 27)
- Hispanic: 28 (male: 17, female: 11)
- Asian: 28 (male: 14, female: 14)
- White: 2 (all female)
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 studentsAlfred S. Madrid Middle School: | 68.7 |
State: | 93.6 |
Statewide Student Assessments
Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments:
(State average from 10,463 schools)
Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments (SB) is one of the online summative assessments - part of California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) System.
The summative assessments are comprehensive, end-of-year assessments of grade-level learning that measure progress toward college and career readiness. Each test in English language arts/literacy (ELA) and mathematics is comprised of two parts: (1) a computer-adaptive test and (2) a performance task, administered within a selected testing window available at 66 percent of the instructional year for grades three through eight, and grade eleven.
The summative assessments are aligned with the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) for ELA and mathematics. The tests capitalize on the strengths of computer adaptive testing efficient and precise measurement across the full range of achievement and timely turnaround of results.
ELA Standard Met and Above
- All32%
- Males26%
- Females38%
- Asian77%
- Hispanic27%
ELA students tested: 824
ELA students with scores: 824
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 32% |
California: | 49% |
Standard Not Met:
40.9%Standard Nearly Met:
26.9%Standard Met:
23.3%Standard Exceeded:
8.9%All Grades:
6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2482.1, Students tested: 201, Standard Not Met: 40.3%, Nearly Met: 26.9%, Met: 24.4%, Exceeded: 8.5%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2510.3, Students tested: 307, Standard Not Met: 38.8%, Nearly Met: 28.3%, Met: 25.1%, Exceeded: 7.8%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2519.8, Students tested: 316, Standard Not Met: 43.4%, Nearly Met: 25.6%, Met: 20.9%, Exceeded: 10.1%)Alfred S. Madrid Middle School - ELA Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Math Standard Met and Above
- All20%
- Males20%
- Females21%
- Asian68%
- Hispanic15%
Math students tested: 851
Math students with scores: 850
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 20% |
State: | 38% |
Standard Not Met:
53.3%Standard Nearly Met:
26.2%Standard Met:
11.8%Standard Exceeded:
8.7%All Grades:
6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2452.5, Students tested: 207, Standard Not Met: 57.0%, Nearly Met: 23.7%, Met: 11.6%, Exceeded: 7.7%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2494.7, Students tested: 315, Standard Not Met: 45.2%, Nearly Met: 31.5%, Met: 15.3%, Exceeded: 8.0%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2494.2, Students tested: 329, Standard Not Met: 58.7%, Nearly Met: 22.8%, Met: 8.5%, Exceeded: 10.0%)Alfred S. Madrid Middle School - Math Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
ELA Standard Met and Above
- All33%
- Males24%
- Females43%
- Asian74%
- Hispanic28%
ELA students tested: 821
ELA students with scores: 815
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 33% |
California: | 48% |
Standard Not Met:
39.0%Standard Nearly Met:
29.0%Standard Met:
25.0%Standard Exceeded:
8.0%All Grades:
6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2468.1, Students tested: 237, Standard Not Met: 43.0%, Nearly Met: 30.0%, Met: 22.0%, Exceeded: 5.0%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2518.7, Students tested: 313, Standard Not Met: 38.0%, Nearly Met: 25.0%, Met: 26.0%, Exceeded: 12.0%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2526.5, Students tested: 271, Standard Not Met: 36.0%, Nearly Met: 31.0%, Met: 26.0%, Exceeded: 7.0%)Alfred S. Madrid Middle School - ELA Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Math Standard Met and Above
- All20%
- Males18%
- Females23%
- Asian69%
- Hispanic15%
Math students tested: 834
Math students with scores: 833
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 20% |
State: | 37% |
Standard Not Met:
52.0%Standard Nearly Met:
28.0%Standard Met:
12.0%Standard Exceeded:
8.0%All Grades:
6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2452.4, Students tested: 239, Standard Not Met: 57.0%, Nearly Met: 26.0%, Met: 11.0%, Exceeded: 5.0%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2493.4, Students tested: 319, Standard Not Met: 46.0%, Nearly Met: 32.0%, Met: 12.0%, Exceeded: 10.0%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2500.1, Students tested: 276, Standard Not Met: 55.0%, Nearly Met: 24.0%, Met: 13.0%, Exceeded: 8.0%)Alfred S. Madrid Middle School - Math Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
ELA Standard Met and Above
- All30%
- Males26%
- Females33%
- Asian83%
- Hispanic25%
ELA students tested: 819
ELA students with scores: 815
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 30% |
State: | 44% |
Standard Not Met:
45.0%Standard Nearly Met:
26.0%Standard Met:
24.0%Standard Exceeded:
6.0%All Grades:
6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2469.7, Students tested: 217, Standard Not Met: 48.0%, Nearly Met: 25.0%, Met: 20.0%, Exceeded: 6.0%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2502.8, Students tested: 276, Standard Not Met: 43.0%, Nearly Met: 25.0%, Met: 25.0%, Exceeded: 7.0%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2510.6, Students tested: 326, Standard Not Met: 44.0%, Nearly Met: 27.0%, Met: 24.0%, Exceeded: 5.0%)Alfred S. Madrid Middle School - ELA Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Math Standard Met and Above
- All16%
- Males15%
- Females17%
- Asian56%
- Hispanic11%
Math students tested: 830
Math students with scores: 827
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 16% |
State: | 34% |
Standard Not Met:
57.0%Standard Nearly Met:
27.0%Standard Met:
11.0%Standard Exceeded:
5.0%All Grades:
6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2457.7, Students tested: 218, Standard Not Met: 55.0%, Nearly Met: 29.0%, Met: 11.0%, Exceeded: 6.0%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2476.6, Students tested: 286, Standard Not Met: 51.0%, Nearly Met: 30.0%, Met: 13.0%, Exceeded: 5.0%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2474.8, Students tested: 326, Standard Not Met: 65.0%, Nearly Met: 23.0%, Met: 8.0%, Exceeded: 4.0%)Alfred S. Madrid Middle School - Math Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
California Alternate Assessments:
(State average from 1,579 schools)
The new California Alternate Assessments (CAAs) are based on alternate achievement standards-called the Core Content Connectors-and linked to the Common Core State Standards. The CAAs are online tests for students with an individualized education program (IEP) that designates the use of an alternate assessment to measure student progress on alternate achievement standards. This alternate assessment is part of the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) System and replaces the California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA) for English language arts and mathematics.
ELA students tested: 12
ELA students with scores: 12
Percentage Level 3: | 0% |
California: | 15% |
Level 1:
50.0% The student showed limited understanding of core concepts.Level 2:
50.0% The student showed foundational understanding of core concepts. Level 3:
0.0% The student showed understanding of core concepts.All Grades:
Math students tested: 12
Math students with scores: 12
Percentage Level 3: | 0% |
California: | 6% |
Level 1:
66.7% The student showed limited understanding of core concepts.Level 2:
33.3% The student showed foundational understanding of core concepts. Level 3:
0.0% The student showed understanding of core concepts.All Grades:
Paper-based CAASPP:
(State average from 9,784 schools)
California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) System includes paper-based tests:
California Standards Tests (CSTs) - The CSTs for science in grades five, eight, and ten are administered only to students in California public schools. All questions are multiple-choice. These tests were developed specifically to assess students' knowledge of the California content standards in science.
California Modified Assessment (CMA) - The CMA for science was administered to eligible students in grades five, eight, and ten. The CMA is a standards-based test for students with an individualized education program who meet the eligibility criteria adopted by the State Board of Education. The Elementary and Secondary Education Act called for a range of assessments appropriate to students' abilities. The CMA provides an appropriate assessment for a small percentage of students allowing them to demonstrate their knowledge of skills in the California academic content standards for science.
CST Science students tested: 241
CST Science students with scores: 235
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 55% |
State: | 54% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
9.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
14.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
22.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
23.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
31.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 369.3, Students tested: 241, Far Below Basic: 9.0%, Below Basic: 14.0%, Basic: 22.0%, Proficient: 23.0%, Advanced: 31.0%)
CMA Science students tested: 34
CMA Science students with scores: 34
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 38% |
State: | 38% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
12.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
15.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
35.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
29.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
9.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 333.5, Students tested: 34, Far Below Basic: 12.0%, Below Basic: 15.0%, Basic: 35.0%, Proficient: 29.0%, Advanced: 9.0%) CST Science students tested: 288
CST Science students with scores: 286
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 55% |
State: | 56% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
8.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
12.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
25.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
21.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
34.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 369.3, Students tested: 288, Far Below Basic: 8.0%, Below Basic: 12.0%, Basic: 25.0%, Proficient: 21.0%, Advanced: 34.0%)
CMA Science students tested: 30
CMA Science students with scores: 30
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 40% |
California: | 38% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
13.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
20.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
27.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
27.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
13.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 335.1, Students tested: 30, Far Below Basic: 13.0%, Below Basic: 20.0%, Basic: 27.0%, Proficient: 27.0%, Advanced: 13.0%)13.0%
20.0%
27.0%
27.0%
13.0%
CST Science students tested: 295
CST Science students with scores: 295
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 47% |
State: | 60% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
15.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
15.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
23.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
16.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
31.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 353.5, Students tested: 295, Far Below Basic: 15.0%, Below Basic: 15.0%, Basic: 23.0%, Proficient: 16.0%, Advanced: 31.0%)15.0%
15.0%
23.0%
16.0%
31.0%
CMA Science students tested: 17
CMA Science students with scores: 17
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 24% |
California: | 39% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
12.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
29.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
35.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
18.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
6.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 318.2, Students tested: 17, Far Below Basic: 12.0%, Below Basic: 29.0%, Basic: 35.0%, Proficient: 18.0%, Advanced: 6.0%) The Physical Fitness Test:
The Physical Fitness Test (PFT) for students in California schools is the FITNESSGRAM. The main goal of the test is to help students in starting life-long habits of regular physical activity.
Aerobic Capacity:7th grade:
(Students tested: 323, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 65.9%, Needs Improvement: 21.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 13.0%)
Body Composition:7th grade:
(Students tested: 323, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 48.9%, Needs Improvement: 21.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 30.0%)
Abdominal Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 323, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 60.7%, Needs Improvement: 39.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 323, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 89.8%, Needs Improvement: 10.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 323, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 48.9%, Needs Improvement: 51.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:7th grade:
(Students tested: 323, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 85.4%, Needs Improvement: 14.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:7th grade:
(Students tested: 308, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 70.8%, Needs Improvement: 22.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 6.5%)
Body Composition:7th grade:
(Students tested: 308, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 52.9%, Needs Improvement: 21.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 25.3%)
Abdominal Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 308, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 76.3%, Needs Improvement: 23.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 308, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 90.3%, Needs Improvement: 9.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 308, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 69.8%, Needs Improvement: 30.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:7th grade:
(Students tested: 308, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 78.6%, Needs Improvement: 21.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:7th grade:
(Students tested: 282, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 79.4%, Needs Improvement: 17.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 3.6%)
Body Composition:7th grade:
(Students tested: 282, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 52.5%, Needs Improvement: 19.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 27.6%)
Abdominal Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 282, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 71.6%, Needs Improvement: 28.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 282, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 92.9%, Needs Improvement: 7.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 282, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 66.0%, Needs Improvement: 34.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:7th grade:
(Students tested: 282, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 78.4%, Needs Improvement: 21.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:7th grade:
(Students tested: 315, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 72.1%, Needs Improvement: 21.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 6.3%)
Body Composition:7th grade:
(Students tested: 315, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 48.6%, Needs Improvement: 27.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 24.4%)
Abdominal Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 315, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 79.7%, Needs Improvement: 20.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 315, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 90.8%, Needs Improvement: 9.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 315, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 60.3%, Needs Improvement: 39.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:7th grade:
(Students tested: 315, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 77.1%, Needs Improvement: 22.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:7th grade:
(Students tested: 315, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 61.0%, Needs Improvement: 27.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 12.0%)
Body Composition:7th grade:
(Students tested: 315, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 44.4%, Needs Improvement: 14.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 41.0%)
Abdominal Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 315, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 78.7%, Needs Improvement: 21.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 315, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 92.7%, Needs Improvement: 7.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 315, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 67.3%, Needs Improvement: 32.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:7th grade:
(Students tested: 315, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 88.9%, Needs Improvement: 11.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:7th grade:
(Students tested: 324, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 64.2%, Needs Improvement: 18.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 17.6%)
Body Composition:7th grade:
(Students tested: 324, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 46.9%, Needs Improvement: 11.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 42.0%)
Abdominal Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 324, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 84.9%, Needs Improvement: 15.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 324, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 92.0%, Needs Improvement: 8.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 324, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 71.6%, Needs Improvement: 28.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:7th grade:
(Students tested: 324, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 94.1%, Needs Improvement: 5.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
California English Language Development Test:
(State average from 9,932 schools)
Students in kindergarten through grade twelve whose home language is not English are required by law to take an English skills test. In California, the test is called the California English Language Development Test (CELDT).
Alfred S. Madrid Middle School - students who met CELDT criterion (all grades)
All Grades:Student Count: 387
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 207
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 53.0% |
California: | 34.0% |
Grade 6:Student Count: 102
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 48
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 47.0% |
State: | 39.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 533.3 |
State: | 532.4 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 517.1 |
California: | 518.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 510.9 |
State: | 518.5 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 523.8 |
California: | 522.0 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 144
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 78
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 54.0% |
California: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 554.5 |
California: | 547.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 540.6 |
California: | 534.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 532.0 |
State: | 529.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 529.5 |
State: | 530.2 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 141
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 81
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 57.0% |
California: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 563.3 |
State: | 556.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 544.9 |
State: | 547.2 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 529.7 |
California: | 536.1 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 536.6 |
California: | 537.0 |
All Grades:Student Count: 384
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 162
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 42.0% |
State: | 34.0% |
Grade 6:Student Count: 122
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 43
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 35.0% |
California: | 41.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 525.1 |
California: | 536.1 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 519.1 |
California: | 523.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 516.8 |
State: | 520.8 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 520.0 |
California: | 524.6 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 140
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 65
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 46.0% |
State: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 544.1 |
California: | 550.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 545.3 |
State: | 536.7 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 531.5 |
California: | 530.6 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 545.2 |
State: | 532.1 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 122
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 54
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 44.0% |
State: | 49.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 546.8 |
California: | 562.4 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 543.1 |
California: | 552.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 537.1 |
California: | 539.5 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 534.8 |
State: | 541.2 |
All Grades:Student Count: 366
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 165
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 45.0% |
State: | 34.0% |
Grade 6:Student Count: 93
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 31
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 33.0% |
State: | 38.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 530.6 |
State: | 535.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 526.9 |
California: | 521.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 517.6 |
California: | 519.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 542.5 |
California: | 522.6 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 134
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 62
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 46.0% |
State: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 537.5 |
State: | 551.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 536.9 |
California: | 538.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 523.3 |
State: | 532.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 536.5 |
California: | 532.1 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 139
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 72
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 52.0% |
California: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 561.4 |
California: | 562.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 561.1 |
California: | 552.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 536.4 |
California: | 543.1 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 546.1 |
California: | 541.5 |
All Grades:Student Count: 378
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 196
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 52.0% |
California: | 34.0% |
Grade 6:Student Count: 107
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 41
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 38.0% |
State: | 40.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 521.3 |
State: | 538.0 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 532.7 |
State: | 525.9 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 515.9 |
California: | 522.1 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 528.9 |
California: | 526.2 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 137
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 76
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 55.0% |
California: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 558.7 |
California: | 549.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 550.0 |
State: | 538.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 528.9 |
State: | 533.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 544.7 |
California: | 535.2 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 134
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 79
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 59.0% |
State: | 49.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 582.5 |
California: | 564.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 575.1 |
State: | 554.9 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 553.8 |
State: | 545.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 563.9 |
California: | 545.9 |
All Grades:Student Count: 372
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 129
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 35.0% |
State: | 34.0% |
Grade 6:Student Count: 105
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 32
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 30.0% |
California: | 39.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 509.3 |
State: | 538.5 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 530.2 |
California: | 525.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 510.0 |
California: | 530.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 530.0 |
California: | 530.3 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 146
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 52
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 36.0% |
California: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 535.2 |
State: | 557.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 537.8 |
California: | 539.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 526.2 |
State: | 543.2 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 535.9 |
State: | 540.4 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 121
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 45
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 37.0% |
California: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 547.3 |
California: | 570.1 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 553.0 |
California: | 552.2 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 517.8 |
California: | 551.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 551.7 |
State: | 548.6 |
All Grades:Student Count: 366
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 159
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 43.0% |
State: | 35.0% |
Grade 6:Student Count: 108
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 39
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 36.0% |
California: | 44.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 528.0 |
State: | 551.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 525.6 |
State: | 532.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 539.2 |
State: | 532.5 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 537.5 |
California: | 534.7 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 132
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 60
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 45.0% |
State: | 50.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 545.2 |
California: | 566.1 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 541.7 |
California: | 544.7 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 529.7 |
State: | 543.8 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 547.3 |
California: | 545.1 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 126
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 60
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 48.0% |
State: | 50.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 577.8 |
State: | 579.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 568.0 |
California: | 558.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 555.8 |
California: | 553.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 567.6 |
California: | 555.6 |
All Grades:Student Count: 367
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 145
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 40.0% |
California: | 31.0% |
Grade 6:Student Count: 116
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 32
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 28.0% |
State: | 40.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 520.0 |
California: | 546.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 524.1 |
State: | 529.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 509.1 |
California: | 533.3 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 523.1 |
State: | 525.3 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 127
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 53
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 42.0% |
California: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 557.2 |
State: | 559.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 541.9 |
State: | 542.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 543.2 |
California: | 548.8 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 541.1 |
California: | 534.4 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 124
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 60
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 48.0% |
State: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 577.5 |
California: | 570.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 572.3 |
State: | 557.2 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 555.1 |
California: | 562.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 556.1 |
California: | 544.1 |
Accountability
Adequate Yearly Progress:
(State average from 9,846 schools)
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) - Accountability system mandated by federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Statistics are based on test results of the Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program, the California High School Exit Examination (CAHSEE), and the California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA).
Alfred S. Madrid Middle School - Adequate Yearly Progress status
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic98
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- White100
- SED99
- LEP98
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 98% (tested 740 out of 752 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 68 out of 68 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 758 out of 769 enrolled)
- English Learners: 98% (tested 542 out of 551 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 129 out of 129 enrolled)
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- White100
- SED99
- LEP99
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 757 out of 761 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 68 out of 68 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 774 out of 778 enrolled)
- English Learners: 99% (tested 557 out of 561 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 129 out of 129 enrolled)
Met all AYP Criteria: Yes
Number of AYP criteria met: 11
Number of AYP criteria possible: 11
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)Attendance rate (calculated by using number of days attended and enrolled) : 97
Met Attendance rate Target: Yes
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
ELA Participation RateAlfred S. Madrid Middle School: | 99.0% |
State: | 95.2% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- American Indian100
- Asian93
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White100
- SED99
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 752 out of 759 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Asian: 93% (tested 63 out of 68 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 798 out of 805 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 458 out of 460 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 134 out of 136 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveAlfred S. Madrid Middle School: | 30.4% |
State: | 42.6% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic26
- Asian86
- SED29
- LEP15
- With Disabilities7
- Hispanic: 26% (184 out of 718 valid scores)
- Asian: 86% (53 out of 62 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 29% (223 out of 768 valid scores)
- English Learners: 15% (65 out of 440 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 7% (8 out of 119 valid scores)
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Math Participation RateHere: | 100.0% |
California: | 94.9% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian98
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 758 out of 760 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Asian: 98% (tested 68 out of 70 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 806 out of 808 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 464 out of 464 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 135 out of 136 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or Above
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic12
- Asian63
- SED15
- LEP6
- With Disabilities3
- Hispanic: 12% (85 out of 719 valid scores)
- Asian: 63% (39 out of 62 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 15% (114 out of 769 valid scores)
- English Learners: 6% (25 out of 442 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 3% (3 out of 120 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 14
Number of AYP criteria possible: 21
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 89.2%
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Asian100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 763 out of 764 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 91 out of 91 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 430 out of 430 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 500 out of 500 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 126 out of 127 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveHere: | 48.6% |
California: | 55.7% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic44
- Asian85
- SED40
- LEP31
- With Disabilities30
- Hispanic: 44% (318 out of 724 valid scores)
- Asian: 85% (75 out of 88 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 40% (165 out of 415 valid scores)
- English Learners: 31% (150 out of 481 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 30% (35 out of 115 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
Math Percent Proficient Target: 89.5%
Math Participation RateHere: | 100.0% |
California: | 98.2% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Asian100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities98
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 762 out of 764 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 91 out of 91 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 430 out of 430 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 500 out of 500 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 98% (tested 125 out of 127 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveHere: | 42.2% |
California: | 59.6% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic37
- Asian85
- SED36
- LEP31
- With Disabilities22
- Hispanic: 37% (269 out of 725 valid scores)
- Asian: 85% (75 out of 88 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 36% (151 out of 415 valid scores)
- English Learners: 31% (147 out of 481 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 22% (25 out of 116 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 12
Number of AYP criteria possible: 21
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 78.4%
ELA Participation RateAlfred S. Madrid Middle School: | 100.0% |
State: | 98.3% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 797 out of 797 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 88 out of 88 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 889 out of 889 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 503 out of 503 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 110 out of 110 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveHere: | 45.9% |
California: | 57.4% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic42
- Asian84
- SED46
- LEP28
- With Disabilities21
- Hispanic: 42% (309 out of 740 valid scores)
- Asian: 84% (70 out of 83 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 46% (381 out of 829 valid scores)
- English Learners: 28% (133 out of 471 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 21% (22 out of 103 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 79%
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 796 out of 797 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 88 out of 88 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 888 out of 889 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 502 out of 503 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 110 out of 110 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveHere: | 37.5% |
California: | 59.9% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic33
- Asian80
- SED38
- LEP25
- With Disabilities19
- Hispanic: 33% (243 out of 739 valid scores)
- Asian: 80% (66 out of 83 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 38% (311 out of 828 valid scores)
- English Learners: 25% (115 out of 470 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 19% (20 out of 103 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 18
Number of AYP criteria possible: 25
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 67.6%
ELA Participation RateAlfred S. Madrid Middle School: | 100.0% |
California: | 98.2% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 895 out of 896 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 103 out of 103 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,007 out of 1,008 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 521 out of 521 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 106 out of 107 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveHere: | 43.8% |
California: | 55.9% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic39
- Asian85
- SED44
- LEP26
- With Disabilities19
- Hispanic: 39% (326 out of 843 valid scores)
- Asian: 85% (85 out of 100 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 44% (418 out of 953 valid scores)
- English Learners: 26% (128 out of 494 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 19% (19 out of 102 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 68.5%
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 895 out of 896 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 103 out of 103 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,007 out of 1,008 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 521 out of 521 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 106 out of 107 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveSchool: | 32.7% |
California: | 59.3% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic27
- Asian79
- SED33
- LEP23
- With Disabilities15
- Hispanic: 27% (229 out of 843 valid scores)
- Asian: 79% (79 out of 100 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 33% (312 out of 953 valid scores)
- English Learners: 23% (115 out of 494 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 15% (15 out of 102 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 15
Number of AYP criteria possible: 23
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 56.8%
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 936 out of 936 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 130 out of 130 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 12 out of 12 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,083 out of 1,083 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 582 out of 582 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 126 out of 126 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveSchool: | 39.1% |
California: | 53.7% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic33
- Asian78
- SED39
- LEP21
- With Disabilities19
- Hispanic: 33% (288 out of 862 valid scores)
- Asian: 78% (96 out of 123 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 39% (391 out of 1,001 valid scores)
- English Learners: 21% (113 out of 542 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 19% (21 out of 110 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 58%
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 934 out of 935 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 130 out of 130 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 12 out of 12 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,081 out of 1,082 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 581 out of 581 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 126 out of 126 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveSchool: | 31.6% |
California: | 57.1% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic25
- Asian77
- SED32
- LEP19
- With Disabilities19
- Hispanic: 25% (215 out of 860 valid scores)
- Asian: 77% (95 out of 123 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 32% (316 out of 999 valid scores)
- English Learners: 19% (101 out of 541 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 19% (21 out of 110 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 13
Number of AYP criteria possible: 21
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 46%
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities98
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 945 out of 949 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 133 out of 133 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 7 out of 7 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 9 out of 9 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,092 out of 1,096 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 655 out of 657 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 98% (tested 124 out of 127 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or Above
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic33
- Asian76
- SED39
- LEP25
- With Disabilities18
- Hispanic: 33% (292 out of 881 valid scores)
- Asian: 76% (98 out of 129 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 39% (401 out of 1,028 valid scores)
- English Learners: 25% (156 out of 624 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 18% (20 out of 113 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 47.5%
Math Participation RateAlfred S. Madrid Middle School: | 100.0% |
State: | 98.2% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 944 out of 948 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 133 out of 133 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 7 out of 7 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 9 out of 9 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,091 out of 1,095 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 655 out of 656 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 125 out of 126 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveHere: | 30.8% |
California: | 55.6% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic24
- Asian75
- SED31
- LEP20
- With Disabilities17
- Hispanic: 24% (212 out of 882 valid scores)
- Asian: 75% (97 out of 129 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 31% (317 out of 1,029 valid scores)
- English Learners: 20% (126 out of 625 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 17% (20 out of 115 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 23
Number of AYP criteria possible: 25
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 35.2%
ELA Participation RateHere: | 100.0% |
California: | 98.1% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 935 out of 935 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 147 out of 147 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 7 out of 7 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 9 out of 9 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,106 out of 1,106 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 679 out of 679 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 114 out of 114 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveAlfred S. Madrid Middle School: | 38.1% |
State: | 48.6% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic33
- Asian70
- SED38
- LEP24
- With Disabilities9
- Hispanic: 33% (295 out of 885 valid scores)
- Asian: 70% (99 out of 141 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 38% (402 out of 1,046 valid scores)
- English Learners: 24% (158 out of 655 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 9% (10 out of 108 valid scores)
Math met overall: Yes
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
Math Percent Proficient Target: 37%
Math Participation RateHere: | 100.0% |
California: | 98.0% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 935 out of 935 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 147 out of 147 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 7 out of 7 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 9 out of 9 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,106 out of 1,106 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 679 out of 679 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 114 out of 114 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveSchool: | 34.8% |
California: | 52.3% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic29
- Asian72
- SED35
- LEP26
- With Disabilities12
- Hispanic: 29% (259 out of 885 valid scores)
- Asian: 72% (102 out of 141 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 35% (366 out of 1,046 valid scores)
- English Learners: 26% (173 out of 655 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 12% (13 out of 108 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 18
Number of AYP criteria possible: 21
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 24.4%
ELA Participation RateHere: | 100.0% |
California: | 97.8% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black84
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 983 out of 983 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 129 out of 129 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 9 out of 9 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 84% (tested 5 out of 6 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 9 out of 9 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,137 out of 1,138 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 739 out of 739 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 96 out of 96 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or Above
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic26
- Asian71
- SED32
- LEP20
- With Disabilities7
- Hispanic: 26% (240 out of 939 valid scores)
- Asian: 71% (90 out of 126 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 32% (343 out of 1,087 valid scores)
- English Learners: 20% (147 out of 719 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 7% (7 out of 95 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
Math Percent Proficient Target: 26.5%
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black84
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 983 out of 983 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 129 out of 129 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 9 out of 9 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 84% (tested 5 out of 6 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 9 out of 9 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,137 out of 1,138 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 739 out of 739 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 96 out of 96 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveAlfred S. Madrid Middle School: | 26.8% |
State: | 50.5% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic21
- Asian71
- SED27
- LEP19
- With Disabilities5
- Hispanic: 21% (196 out of 939 valid scores)
- Asian: 71% (90 out of 126 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 27% (294 out of 1,087 valid scores)
- English Learners: 19% (138 out of 719 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 5% (5 out of 95 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 17
Number of AYP criteria possible: 21
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 24.4%
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,056 out of 1,056 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 131 out of 131 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 11 out of 11 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 17 out of 17 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,220 out of 1,220 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 758 out of 758 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 95 out of 95 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or Above
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic20
- Asian65
- Filipino55
- White31
- SED26
- LEP15
- With Disabilities4
- Hispanic: 20% (209 out of 1,028 valid scores)
- Asian: 65% (82 out of 127 valid scores)
- Filipino: 55% (6 out of 11 valid scores)
- White: 31% (5 out of 16 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 26% (303 out of 1,187 valid scores)
- English Learners: 15% (112 out of 758 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 4% (4 out of 95 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
Math Percent Proficient Target: 26.5%
Math Participation RateAlfred S. Madrid Middle School: | 100.0% |
State: | 97.5% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,056 out of 1,056 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 131 out of 131 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 11 out of 11 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 17 out of 17 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,220 out of 1,220 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 758 out of 758 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 95 out of 95 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveAlfred S. Madrid Middle School: | 26.9% |
California: | 49.9% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Asian69
- Filipino64
- White19
- SED27
- LEP19
- With Disabilities6
- Asian: 69% (88 out of 127 valid scores)
- Filipino: 64% (7 out of 11 valid scores)
- White: 19% (3 out of 16 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 27% (320 out of 1,187 valid scores)
- English Learners: 19% (146 out of 758 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 6% (6 out of 95 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 15
Number of AYP criteria possible: 21
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 24.4%
ELA Participation RateAlfred S. Madrid Middle School: | 100.0% |
California: | 99.3% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,076 out of 1,078 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 115 out of 115 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 10 out of 10 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 7 out of 7 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 19 out of 19 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,229 out of 1,231 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 769 out of 770 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 59 out of 59 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveHere: | 26.8% |
California: | 44.5% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic22
- Asian65
- White47
- SED27
- LEP16
- Hispanic: 22% (223 out of 996 valid scores)
- Asian: 65% (68 out of 105 valid scores)
- White: 47% (8 out of 17 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 27% (305 out of 1,137 valid scores)
- English Learners: 16% (117 out of 739 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 26.5%
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Asian99
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,074 out of 1,078 enrolled)
- Asian: 99% (tested 114 out of 115 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 10 out of 10 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 7 out of 7 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 19 out of 19 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,226 out of 1,231 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 768 out of 770 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 58 out of 59 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or Above
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic21
- Asian68
- White24
- SED26
- LEP18
- Hispanic: 21% (209 out of 996 valid scores)
- Asian: 68% (71 out of 104 valid scores)
- White: 24% (4 out of 17 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 26% (291 out of 1,136 valid scores)
- English Learners: 18% (135 out of 739 valid scores)
Health & Safety
Offenses:
(State average from 5,445 schools)
An incident refers to a specific criminal act involving one or more victims and offenders. For example, if two students are robbed without a weapon, at the same time and place, this is classified as two robbery victimizations but only one robbery without a weapon incident
A weapon is any instrument or object used with the intent to threaten, injure, or kill. This includes look-alikes if they are used to threaten others.
Sexual assault is an incident that includes threatened rape, fondling, indecent liberties, or child molestation. Both male and female students can be victims of sexual assault. Classification of these incidents should take into consideration the age and developmentally appropriate behavior of the offender(s)
Robbery is taking or attempting to take anything of value that is owned by another person or organization, under confrontational circumstances by force or threat of force or violence and/or by putting the victim in fear. A key difference between robbery and theft/larceny is that robbery involves a threat or assault.
Physical attack or fight refers to an actual and intentional touching or striking of another person against his/her will, or the intentional causing of bodily harm to an individual. Physical attack or fight does not include rape.
A threat refers to an act where there was no physical contact between the offender and victim but the victim felt that physical harm could have occurred based on verbal or nonverbal communication by the offender. This includes nonverbal threats (e.g., brandishing a weapon), and verbal threats of physical harm which are made in person. Threats made over the telephone or threatening letters are excluded.
At least one incident at this school that involved a shooting: No
Any of this school's students, faculty, or staff died as a result of a homicide committed at this school: No
Incidents of sexual assault (other than rape): 1
Incidents of robbery without a weapon: 1
Incidents of physical attack or fight without a weapon: 15
Incidents of threats of physical attack without a weapon: 57
Total incidents per 1,000 studentsSchool: | 87.7 |
California: | 60.8 |
Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
(State average from 8,737 schools)
A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 67 (male: 41, female: 26)
- Hispanic: 67 (male: 41, female: 26)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 31 (male: 17, female: 14)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 19 (male: 14, female: 5)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 studentsAlfred S. Madrid Middle School: | 79.4 |
California: | 172.7 |
Chronic Student Absenteeism
- Hispanic76
- American Indian2
- Asian2
- Black2
- White2
- LEP34
- IDEA13
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 84 (male: 37, female: 47)
- Hispanic: 76 (male: 35, female: 41)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 2 (all male)
- Asian: 2 (all female)
- Black: 2 (all female)
- White: 2 (all female)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 34 (male: 14, female: 20)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 13 (male: 8, female: 5)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 studentsHere: | 99.5 |
California: | 178.2 |
Suspensions:
(State average from 1,406 schools)
Out-of-school suspension - For students with disabilities served under IDEA : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his/her regular school for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes to another setting (e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include both removals in which no individualized family service plan(IFSP) or individualized education plan(IEP) services are provided because the removal is 10 days or less as well as removals in which the child continues to receive services according to his/her IFSP or IEP.
- For students without disabilities and students with disabilities served solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his / her regular school for at least half a day(but less than the remainder of the school year) for disciplinary purposes to another setting(e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include removals in which no educational services are provided, and removals in which educational services are provided(e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring).
In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision. School days missed due to out-of-school suspension: 82 (male: 67, female: 15)
- Hispanic: 82 (male: 67, female: 15)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 55 (male: 44, female: 11)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 38 (male: 37, female: 1)
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students without disabilities): 29
Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students without disabilities)Alfred S. Madrid Middle School: | 34.4 |
California: | 84.8 |
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 16 (male: 8, female: 8)
- Hispanic: 16 (male: 8, female: 8)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 10 (male: 2, female: 8)
Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 19 (male: 11, female: 8)
- Hispanic: 19 (male: 11, female: 8)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 13 (male: 8, female: 5)
Students without disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students with disabilities): 23
Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students with disabilities)Alfred S. Madrid Middle School: | 27.3 |
State: | 28.1 |
Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 8 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
Students with disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
- Hispanic: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)
Students with disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 5 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 42 (male: 23, female: 19)
- Hispanic: 40 (male: 23, female: 17)
- Asian: 2 (all female)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 25 (male: 14, female: 11)
Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 15 (male: 10, female: 5)
- Hispanic: 13 (male: 8, female: 5)
- Asian: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Students without disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 9 (male: 5, female: 4)
- Hispanic: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
- Asian: 2 (all female)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all female)
Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 9 (male: 7, female: 2)
- Hispanic: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
- Black: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
Students with disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
Students with disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all male)
Expulsions:
(State average from 1,805 schools)
Expulsion without educational services refers to an action taken by the local educational agency of removing a child from his/her regular school for disciplinary purposes, and not providing educational services to the child for the remainder of the school year or longer in accordance with local educational agency policy. Expulsion without services also includes removals resulting from violations of the Gun Free Schools Act that are modified to less than 365 days.
Students without Disabilities who received an expulsion without educational services: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
Students without Disabilities who received an expulsion without educational services per 1,000 studentsAlfred S. Madrid Middle School: | 2.4 |
State: | 6.0 |
Classes & Courses
Algebra I:
(State average from 1,382 schools)
Algebra I is a (college-preparatory) course that includes the study of properties and operations of the real number system; evaluating rational algebraic expressions; solving and graphing first degree equations and inequalities; translating word problems into equations; operations with and factoring of polynomials; and solving simple quadratic equations. Algebra I is a foundation course leading to higher-level mathematics courses, including Geometry and Algebra II.
Number of Algebra I classes: 9
7-8th grade student enrollment in Algebra I
- Hispanic253
- Asian37
- Black4
- White2
- LEP109
- IDEA19
7-8th grade student enrollment in Algebra I: 296 (male: 140, female: 156)
- Hispanic: 253 (male: 113, female: 140)
- Asian: 37 (male: 23, female: 14)
- Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- White: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 109 (male: 53, female: 56)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 19 (male: 14, female: 5)
7-8th grade studenst who passed Algebra I
- Hispanic146
- Asian35
- LEP44
- IDEA11
7-8th grade studenst who passed Algebra I: 181 (male: 77, female: 104)
- Hispanic: 146 (male: 55, female: 91)
- Asian: 35 (male: 22, female: 13)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 44 (male: 19, female: 25)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 11 (male: 7, female: 4)
Percent of 7-8th grade students who passedHere: | 61.1% |
California: | 83.6% |
Number of Algebra I classes: 9
Comments
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: